![]() |
|
#161
|
|||
|
Gms can check when and how often he used it. You know, perun is a monk and therefore not out pulling dragons, how is it an advantage for the raid if he knows where the mob is and not telling anyone?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#162
|
||||
|
Quote:
How do you know he wasn't using SEQ to check giant pathing in the lair to accomplish this? | |||
|
|
||||
|
#163
|
|||
|
OK Guys. This thread is not for discussing inter guild politics and such, there are plenty of threads for that, and you always have the option of making another one. Lets try and focus on the end result of all of the torch waving going on in different threads. It's not going to change what the GM's decided, and it's not helping get out awareness as the audience is already hyper-aware of the situation. Let's just cool it off guys.
Whatever happens, please keep this thread on topic.
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#164
|
||||||||
|
Not true mitic. The if you can't beat em join em only applies on a level playing field. If someone is deliberately using anything others don't have access to (and this covers more then just 3rd party programs) to give them an unfair advantage then it isn't level. We are talkin deliberate willful knowing acts. There is only one game in town as far as a classic eq emu server and there is no reason multiple guilds can't raid the same targets here. Your argument that obviously we are all impotent, ignorant, and incapable is a joke.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And Hasbinbad it is on this topic because it directly correlates. It keeps going off topic (or back on topic) because of the fact is is related. You cry to put down the flames and while I am with you in principle I am not with you to censor anything that might cry outrage at what has been going on apparently on this server. Questioning GM decisions should be a dead issue because that was posted by Rogean a while back but if people feel strongly about something they believe to be a moral or ethical issue you are going to hear about it. Forums are a place to do that are they not? And if you value your reputation perhaps you should not be part of the machine that leads people to feel such outrage. Quote:
__________________
Quote:
| |||||||
|
Last edited by h0tr0d (shaere); 09-07-2011 at 04:17 PM..
|
|
|||||||
|
#165
|
||||
|
Quote:
The outrage directed at cheaters is not the problem. The cheaters are. This thread is entirely self-serving. You couldn't care less about this server's health. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#166
|
||||
|
Quote:
Your so-called facts are irrelevant in the face of other facts that make yours essentially meaningless. You do not want to hear the important points that I am making. Let me state them again and try to make it as blunt as I can, cause I am done with this. 1) We are all guests here - you have no rights, other than the right to not play. 2) You need to get over the idea that everything needs to be, can be or will be fair in life. Life is fundamentally unfair. Grow up. Get used to it. That doesn't mean you should simply accept every injustice, but you have to use good judgement and know how far you can push things. You are not using good judgement in this case or you don't have it. Let it go, you have already lost and your strident mantra that the devs are unfair is merely serving to stink up the boards at this point. 3) I reject the idea that Rogean and crew have been fundamentally unfair. You present some information you call facts, but I have no way to verify them and no way to know what you left out. The "rebuttal" from Rogean in another thread includes that statement that not all information used to judge a situation will always be publicly known. Since I trust him, I have to believe that either you are holding back info or there is stuff you don't know about the situation you are so incensed about. 4) The people who make the server make the rules. They can decide if and when situations are such that an ammendment of normal punishments should be made. Though it is entirely within their right, they did not even change the rules - they just changed the punishment for the rules. Even our own judicial system gives judges leeway to do this. Them doing so does NOT make this a corrupt box. That is YOUR judgement, YOUR name calling and YOUR problem. 5) I expect a certain degree of autocracy here, because that is exactly what it is, whether you like it of not. Inherent in the idea of autocracy is a degree of unfairness. I like this game implementation so much that I am willing to put up with that. It is the price of admission. So, even if Rogean and company were being repeatedly, unequivically unfair, I would STILL play here unless it reached the point where I just couldn't bear it. In that case, I would leave. I would no be so naive and irritating as to think I could get my way by inciting popular unrest.
__________________
~ give me a large old school fantasy MMORPG, make it PVE, and hold the voice chat ~
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#167
|
|||
|
^^^
lol its a videogame pal | ||
|
|
|||
|
#168
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Currently the GMs decisions have favored current cheaters over previous cheaters, they've favored certain guilds over others in terms of guild-wide punishments and thus there are some obvious inconsistencies in the way that the rules are applied. This isn't somebody's uninformed opinion either. Quote:
Nedala, Perun himself explained how it gave you guys an advantage when he explained why/how he was caught on your forums. Koota used SEQ to track a mob that spawned on him, Perun used SEQ to track mobs/players in the zone. Both of them used the program and gained an advantage. | ||||
|
Last edited by Skope; 09-07-2011 at 04:49 PM..
|
|
||||
|
#169
|
|||
|
The gms/devs do listen to what the server thinks, probably not that much, but saying that speaking up will not change anything is wrong. It may not, but there is a chance that it will; it has before. Especially on something that almost the entire server agrees on. Remember global ooc my friends?
WHAT DO WE WANT????? WHEN DO WE WANT IT?????? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#170
|
|||||
|
Quote:
NAO!
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|