All 50 states have certified the election.

[Gravydoo II]

LOL dude wants the election be to over turned for bullshit reasoning to keep his party in power.

Trump lost. Its over. Get over it or just keep pulling your hair out and giving trump, the alleged billionaire, money. LOLOLOL every time. Why cant a "billionaire" pay his own bills to "stop the steal" ?? Why did he ask all of you to pay for it?

[kaizersoze]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is literally the entire basis of the lawsuit you absolute doofus, what do you think they are suing over? Do you know anything about the legal system at all?

These states made last minute changes to their voting laws over covid 19 that violated their own state constitutions. You have to amend your state constitution to make such a change, and they did not. This is the layman's shorthand version of the texas suit. For the love of god read a book.

So because they allowed mail in and early voting, and arent allowed to count the ballots until after they've all come in, so that they could spare masses of their population getting covid - which even if they will likely live many have had severe long term side effects after recovery, they did a bad.

The real bullet point to take from this is "Trump snowflakes lose, demands they throw out all the mail in ballots because they voted differently than I did and since we lost we need a fucking coup to undermine democracy."

[douglas1999]

Originally Posted by kaizersoze [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So because they allowed mail in and early voting, and arent allowed to count the ballots until after they've all come in, so that they could spare masses of their population getting covid - which even if they will likely live many have had severe long term side effects after recovery, they did a bad.

The real bullet point to take from this is "Trump snowflakes lose, demands they throw out all the mail in ballots because they voted differently than I did and since we lost we need a fucking coup to undermine democracy."

No, but thank you for politicizing the complaint. The complaint is that they violated their own state constitutions, which disenfranchises other states who did not violate their own state constitutions.

[Gravydoo II]

They didnt. They didnt violate anything, according to the supreme court. The fact is, if a state wants to change its laws, they can change their laws. Texas does not get to say which laws to follow in which states.

Again. The supreme court, just now, said "BWWWAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHA texas!! you fucking cartwheel...!"

[cd288]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, but thank you for politicizing the complaint. The complaint is that they violated their own state constitutions, which disenfranchises other states who did not violate their own state constitutions.

So first off that’s just a frivolous and totally false claim. Second, there’s no standing to sue based on that based on the way our system is set up. If you could sue states for the ways you allege they violate laws then you couldn’t have states setting up their own laws for other things like abortion etc (which I’m certain someone like you wouldn’t want)

[Abought56]

Oh my. That is adorable.

[kjs86z]

"The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant & fatal error in security & election integrity."

https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2...edacted%5D.pdf

Congrats on your rigged Dominion machines, Bidenbros.

[douglas1999]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So first off that’s just a frivolous and totally false claim. Second, there’s no standing to sue based on that based on the way our system is set up. If you could sue states for the ways you allege they violate laws then you couldn’t have states setting up their own laws for other things like abortion etc (which I’m certain someone like you wouldn’t want)

The argument is that since the presidency is a federal level election whose outcome affects all states, individual states violating their own internal laws has a meaningful and tangible effect on other states who did not violate their own internal laws. I agree that states can't sue one another based on alleged violations of any law, this was specifically about election laws in a presidental election.

Also I'm pro-choice until the end of the first trimester, and for legitimate rape victims. Just to clear that up.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The argument is that since the presidency is a federal level election whose outcome affects all states, individual states violating their own internal laws has a meaningful and tangible effect on other states who did not violate their own internal laws. I agree that states can't sue one another based on alleged violations of any law, this was specifically about election laws in a presidental election.

Also I'm pro-choice until the end of the first trimester, and for legitimate rape victims. Just to clear that up.

I don't think you understand the way the court system works in terms of the concept of judicial review and past precedent. If the court had agreed to hear the case, it would mean that states have standing to sue other states for violations of any laws. It wouldn't be limited to presidential elections. Maybe eventually after 10 years or so of court cases we might get to the point where SCOTUS issued enough opinions that it was only limited to presidential elections and that was 100% settled, but hearing this case would have basically destroyed the independence of the states. And it's pretty funny that Republicans wanted it to be heard considering it would ultimately result in the exact opposite of what the Republican party stands for (i.e. state independence and ability to run their show the way they want to).

Hypocrisy at it's finest.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by kjs86z [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2...edacted%5D.pdf

Congrats on your rigged Dominion machines, Bidenbros.

Hmm...a firm employed by Trump and his lawyers issues a report agreeing with what Trump and his lawyers have made up. Shocker.

Hate to break it to you bud, but when it comes to third party service providers that conduct audits or investigations and that you hired, you can basically pay them to say whatever you want. It's not like if, say, the SEC conducted an investigation in a securities fraud situation. It's a third party who is being engaged by people who want the third party to provide a certain result.