Is Rogean rich!??!?

[dafier]

You know it's good when you don't know the significant part of the awesome climax achieved.

Enjoy it my friend....enjoy.

[maskedmelonpai]

well, i not wanna dwell on size too much, but that "cluster" seem liek a little guy given today's processing capacities. would expect liek terrahetz an petabytes from a big dog. jus sayin'...

[mcoy]

Granted - it isn't a large implementation, it's a small enterprise layout. I was just wishing to show that yes you can indeed have a high density and expect reasonable performance. The majority of the vms are running low-volume websites with various back-ends so they don't need much in the way of resources. There's also 3 other clusters involved - there are requirements as to what data can reside on the same physical hardware as other types of data, so there is both a physical and logical separation involved.

And just to set the thread straight... I was agreeing with daf's comment about the person bashing vmware needing to return to their day job. I should have written that more clearly.

-Mcoy

[mcoy]

Originally Posted by mcoy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Granted - it isn't a large implementation, it's a small enterprise layout. I was just wishing to show that yes you can indeed have a high density and expect reasonable performance. The majority of the vms are running low-volume websites with various back-ends so they don't need much in the way of resources. There's also 3 other clusters involved - there are requirements as to what data can reside on the same physical hardware as other types of data, so there is both a physical and logical separation involved.

And just to set the thread straight... I was agreeing with daf's comment about the person bashing vmware needing to return to their day job. I should have written that more clearly.

-Mcoy

Interesting, didn't realize you can't edit here...

Edit: Oh, and it's old hardware (5+). Hooray long-duration contracts... Ugh.

[maskedmelonpai]

ohhhhh, well yeah that make sense. i agree on the density, i mean even though it not that big, it do look pretty thick.

you guys gottem good (^。~)v

[maskedmelonpai]

Originally Posted by mcoy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Interesting, didn't realize you can't edit here...

yeah it a present point of frustration for me >.>

[mcoy]

Originally Posted by maskedmelonpai [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ohhhhh, well yeah that make sense. i agree on the density, i mean even though it not that big, it do look pretty thick.

you guys gottem good (^。~)v

You have become better at Innuendo! (174)

[mickmoranis]

this thread was a great read, but why do I feel like it was at least 5 pages longer when it was originally made rip BJorigionalman

[skarlorn]

Originally Posted by maskedmelonpai [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ohhhhh, well yeah that make sense. i agree on the density, i mean even though it not that big, it do look pretty thick.

you guys gottem good (^。~)v

Lol'd and wriggled in my seat.

I miss big j too Mick

[Lhancelot]

Originally Posted by mcoy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have become better at Innuendo! (174)

MM is easily maxed in Innuendo, don't see anyway to improve tbh. Almost every MM post if you look hard enough, you can find an innuendo. Some small, some large, but you always find them.