|
View Poll Results: What is the ideal size for areola? | |||
None, breasts should not have nipples either. | 2 | 10.53% | |
None, it detracts from the composition by trivializing the nipple. | 1 | 5.26% | |
A dime, some embellishment is good | 1 | 5.26% | |
A quarter, they are and should be seen as their own feature, but remain subordinate | 5 | 26.32% | |
A fifty cent piece, the golden mean, yadda yadda yadda | 3 | 15.79% | |
A coaster, they are the subject, the rest is background or embellishment | 0 | 0% | |
A dessert plate, I don't care much for backgrounds | 0 | 0% | |
Moar, there is something wrong with me. | 0 | 0% | |
What's an areola? | 1 | 5.26% | |
Like bush, the towers are the limit | 6 | 31.58% | |
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
so what in the mother fucking fuck tho... settle... calm... i better get the fuck out this mother fucker huh... faded eyes despise the desparaged cries only to look upon the... what in the fuck tho...
Outkast - Git up, Git out Goodie Mob - Black Ice | ||
Last edited by entruil; 09-13-2016 at 01:53 AM..
Reason: +1 for areolas...
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
Tangental discussion abounds, but I see at least one voter is confused about the subject matter. To clarify, the areola is the ring of pigmented skin surrounding the nipple. It can range in size from very small to very large as indicated in the poll options, though variation is far less extreme among males than females. Excessively large areola are uniquely feminine in nature, but lack the general appeal of other feminine features among gynophiles. This thread and associated poll seeks to ascertain the reason(s) for this by identifying contrary preferences and their causes.
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| ||
|
#13
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#14
|
|||
|
Would you rather your gf have a tight puss or loose puss... yeah.... gonna go with the nipples that aren't the size of cantaloupes...
| ||
|
#15
|
||||
|
Quote:
Many things can be made to work and work well, but because they do does not diminish the general propensity of the thing. Large areola are indisputably disadvantaged in the arena of aesthetic prominence whether exceptional specimens exist or not. If ever we are to right the injustice of areola size bias we must understand the nature of preference and whence it cometh, be it inborn or socially infused zog water as you assert. What do you consider ideal?
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| |||
|
#16
|
|||
|
if we talking quarters deal me in, if we talking dinner plates then ill pass on desert
__________________
Surron / Geom
| ||
|
#17
|
|||
|
I should add for clarity, large areola are like fingernail beds that bisect the field between the cuticle and fingertip, or second toes that surpass the big toe in reach. Both are tolerable and may even be appreciated as a part of a larger composition, but their nature is generally speaking, deleterious. That is to say, in the absence of other more virtuous characteristics, they are incapable of sparing the greater composition duly assigned ill-regard, as unfortunate as that may be :/
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| ||
|
#18
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
|