Areola: The Breast Forgotten Feature
 

Lost in greater breast discourse to infinitely more important topics of form and mass, this all too often forgotten feature, I contend, is pivotal in general breast valuation.

It saddens me that excessive size of this blessed crossroads of the mammary significantly dampens the appeal of any pair of breasts. This is at least true for me, I suspect it a universal truth, though it may simply be a case of normalcy bias and those with or surrounded by massive areola may find them appealing.

As a general rule, I have settled that any adult hand, regardless of sex, is sufficiently large that aesthetically acceptable areola should not seep from beneath the edges of one's palm. Beyond this most general of rules however, I have failed, quite utterly, to identify ideal ratios or properly pleasing ranges either for nipple-areola or areola-breast.

Admittedly I have not given this the thought it deserves though the general idea weighs heavily on my mind whenever I am accosted by supersized areola on an otherwise pleasing pair of breasts.

What are your thoughts?

Such critical thoughts about another's body indicates an inability to be mindfully present.

Regardless of size, shape, density, or configuration you should rejoice whenever you have one in hand.

If something doesn't do it for you, that's fine; simply move on. Such pro and con woolgathering serves little purpose.

But I'm being to harsh, also. I have to admit that collaboratively exploring your tastes is one of many paths to self-awareness. Please forgive me.

Your original question is impossible for me to answer because I'm omnimammarian. Oh well.

I AINT datin a bitch with whack Aerolas

I ALSO dumped my last girlfriend because she had low hemoglobins
I aint trying to date bitches with whack aerolas or low hemos

As proper decorum demands - I voted bsh/twr - however "Moar, there is something wrong with me" was a strong contender and I am having overwhelming feelings of remorse for not voting that way.

Ohhhh, I am SO sorry Spyds, I did not mean to creat any conflict. I shall see to it that forum law is amended such that our forum warriors not find themselves in positions wherein they are forced to choose between honor and conscience.

To the topic at hand though, I am intrigued. Which of the following would you say played prominently in your desire to vote the way you were unable?

[ ] Our Lord Below, Bristlebane
[ ] General Deviance
[ ] Texture
[ ] Pity
[ ] Abnormally large hands
[ ] Pokeball Fetish
[ ] Special Deviance
[ ] Assumed static areola-breast ratio (I.e. bigger a = bigger b)
[ ] Normalcy bias
[ ] Other

A wonderful thread. Eloquence. Breasts. In my walks through the valley of Teat I must agree that a too large Areola, and fifty cent piece is pushing it, is grounds for a silent kick from party.

Currently I am dating a set of breasts which please me greatly. They are ample and yet not too large. They are pert. The nippers are responsive to my tongue and the Areolas are of perfect size of stroking circuitously.

They are some of my favorite breasts. Thanks

what option there for who am i to judge... or to my way of thinking; this one that one light one brown one (etc...).. hmm maybe the bush but... bush was a patzy ... but then again... bush... hmmm... ill take all of the above for dot dot dot

large areolas are somehow less disgusting than fake tits

Isn't it amazing how your eyes will pop to that busty babe and your depredation rises to the haft of your cock like the calloused hand of an ogre reaching for his Jagged Blade of War, only to realize half a second later that the tits are fake and she is but a mere scrumpet.