Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-16-2015, 10:22 PM
dali_lb dali_lb is offline
Sarnak

dali_lb's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brocode [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sometimes "classic" in p99 dictionary relates to chinese torture. Like many other things that were "unfixed" to make it classic, but sadly when its an advantage to players and is classic its not elegible to be fixed as pets with double 2 handers, handing 2 handers to npcs to attack slower, etc... As some others items/finds that werent supposed to be ingame, are also kept in.

The game is not classic, the classic is whatever the owners decide they want to be in the game. And we hope our finds are considered.
It goes both ways.

like emu servers bugged spell resists rate of npc's, or classic npc casters very limited money to buy all their spells that was first fixed on live long after luclin came out.

Some classic behaviours that is classified as Sony's lazyness to fix bugs is just plain being ignored by the devs, especially if it gives the player an advantage.

but you can be sure that any anoying bugs will be simulated [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyone remember levitating over water in U Guk to solo kill AC with your lvl 19 druid or wizard ? Sony fixed that around 2007 and people rarely got warned for it

Or the fact that EE's in Gorge ans EK's pets is supposed to poof if you one shot the owner.

There is really many "classic" behaviours that isn't implemented because the devs just don't feel like it
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-11-2015, 02:28 AM
Snackies Snackies is offline
Fire Giant

Snackies's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's the one that made me check the notes!
__________________
Good times, sorry you weren't there.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-12-2015, 11:46 AM
kaev kaev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brocode [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sometimes "classic" in p99 dictionary relates to chinese torture. Like many other things that were "unfixed" to make it classic, but sadly when its an advantage to players and is classic its not elegible to be fixed as pets with double 2 handers, handing 2 handers to npcs to attack slower, etc... As some others items/finds that werent supposed to be ingame, are also kept in.

The game is not classic, the classic is whatever the owners decide they want to be in the game. And we hope our finds are considered.
You're being selective. When I first started playing here undead in LGuk still didn't flee. Did the players who knew better step up and say "hey guys, LGuk without fleeing ghouls is way the fuck easier than it was on live, we really feel you ought to make rangers useful there in groups"? Nope. Root & charm on p99 have mostly been been way more reliable than they were on live, at least during the 3-1/2 years I've been here, and 99% of the player feedback about them has been loud childish whining when the devs try to get them to behave more classic-like.

The classholes' unholy crusade against quality-of-life stuff is annoying at times, but at least they aren't operating out of pure self-interest like all the "OMG! you nerfed XYZ now my class is useless!" QQers who show up everytime the devs fix some bit of unclassic easymode.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-12-2015, 12:30 PM
Madbad Madbad is offline
Planar Protector

Madbad's Avatar

Join Date: May 2014
Location: Qeynos Hills
Posts: 1,453
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Littlegyno 13.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
U sick fuck
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-14-2015, 05:47 AM
Brocode Brocode is offline
Fire Giant

Brocode's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 672
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're being selective. When I first started playing here undead in LGuk still didn't flee. Did the players who knew better step up and say "hey guys, LGuk without fleeing ghouls is way the fuck easier than it was on live, we really feel you ought to make rangers useful there in groups"? Nope. Root & charm on p99 have mostly been been way more reliable than they were on live, at least during the 3-1/2 years I've been here, and 99% of the player feedback about them has been loud childish whining when the devs try to get them to behave more classic-like.

The classholes' unholy crusade against quality-of-life stuff is annoying at times, but at least they aren't operating out of pure self-interest like all the "OMG! you nerfed XYZ now my class is useless!" QQers who show up everytime the devs fix some bit of unclassic easymode.
Just wanted to express that either its classic or not if staff dislikes, wont get in, unless its a bug/exploit that needs the fix. And fairness is all about of perspective, you will always want things to be facilitated aka the shift buying/tradeskills.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-14-2015, 01:32 PM
kaev kaev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brocode [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just wanted to express that either its classic or not if staff dislikes, wont get in, unless its a bug/exploit that needs the fix. And fairness is all about of perspective, you will always want things to be facilitated aka the shift buying/tradeskills.
True enough, if i'm understanding what you wrote.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.