![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: so? | |||
| no teams |
|
70 | 57.85% |
| 2 teams |
|
22 | 18.18% |
| 3 teams |
|
29 | 23.97% |
| Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
|
||||
|
Quote:
No? Then I vote FFA. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#52
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
Last edited by greatdane; 09-13-2011 at 11:24 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#53
|
||||
|
Quote:
Frankly, I don't care enough about this debate to bother to find data; and by the same token, if something as rudimentary as the population makeup of the four Zek servers are news to anyone- they shouldn't be involved in this debate to begin with. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#54
|
|||
|
Race teams were fun and made for interesting guilds like Liberation of the Underfoot (short only pvp guild). The only things that sucked were, as mentioend before the inability to kill someone on your team who was annoying and OOR healing.
Also it often ended up being 3 vs 1 with Short/Humans/Elves vs. Darks. But the dark team was also defintely the biggest team. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#55
|
|||
|
im sorry but i disagree. softcoded race teams (vz style) are clearly the best choice. yes there is x-teaming and immy healing. these things are classic and part of the game.
there is simply no other team setup as dynamic and fun as vz style race teams. that being said, my second choice (and probably the one that r99 will choose) is ffa | ||
|
|
|||
|
#57
|
|||
|
Teams are a bad idea simply because we don't have the population to support it. I'm not sure why that isn't very easy to understand.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#58
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Mitic<Transatlantic Nihilum> | |||
|
|
||||
|
#59
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#60
|
|||
|
On launch day, yes. That's likely to drop by a fair bit as the new car smell wears off, and anyway the numbers are half to a third of the peak numbers for like 12 hours of the day. If we expect 2-300 players, which is a little optimistic, divide that by whatever number of teams and you have the effective playerbase for group/raid availability. For PvP, you have the playerbase minus your own team. With FFA, there's no such limitation and you've minimized the risk of population-related problems as much as you can without actually attracting more players; and since a significant majority seem in favor of FFA, it's safe to say that FFA will actually attract more players in the first place.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|