Bag Limit per Guild

[xexbis0]

Why wouldn't having 3+ people from the same guild garner a bag like it would a lockout timer?

Seems like an easy fix. You help another guild with 3+ people, your guild gets a bag.

[Tasslehofp99]

Originally Posted by xexbis0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why wouldn't having 3+ people from the same guild garner a bag like it would a lockout timer?

Seems like an easy fix. You help another guild with 3+ people, your guild gets a bag.

This is how it works.

[LizardNecro]

Originally Posted by xexbis0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why wouldn't having 3+ people from the same guild garner a bag like it would a lockout timer?

Seems like an easy fix. You help another guild with 3+ people, your guild gets a bag.

That seems like a simple and good idea to me.

[Tasslehofp99]

Originally Posted by LizardNecro [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That seems like a simple and good idea to me.

That is already how it works.

[Erati]

Originally Posted by xexbis0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why wouldn't having 3+ people from the same guild garner a bag like it would a lockout timer?

Seems like an easy fix. You help another guild with 3+ people, your guild gets a bag.

they are separating when the bags are in play, and raid together when they are not.

so when they have 3+ people from the same guild, its on targets that don't then involve bag limits.

I agree with Tass here, if we shackle IB/FE together as one .. it sets a bad precedent for when other guilds want to help each other on FFA targets.

Gore yesterday for example. Taken wiped, TMO wiped, IB/FE wiped, TMO wiped

had BDA not been suspended, or more Divinity and Europa on, Taken would have been communicating with the other R guilds to 'take away' the FFA Gore from the Cs

that is part of the fun of this system, figuring out how to down the FFA targets with so many guilds gunning for them in a much smaller variance

[Geofizzle]

So great, this means that if I'm in TMO for repops i can put an alt into another guild, raid with TMO for loot on my main, and then raid for loot in another alt guild or "allied" guild. Thanks FE/IB for clearing that up.

[Tasslehofp99]

Originally Posted by Geofizzle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So great, this means that if I'm in TMO for repops i can put an alt into another guild, raid with TMO for loot on my main, and then raid for loot in another alt guild or "allied" guild. Thanks FE/IB for clearing that up.

No.

IB and FE are separately run guilds with different leadership and different rosters. We've been raiding together for months now, months PRIOR to the new agreement. Perhaps TMO should just make an alliance of their own, if they can find anyone willing to team with them. Are you seriously this dumb or are you just trolling?

[Handull]

Originally Posted by Geofizzle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So great, this means that if I'm in TMO for repops i can put an alt into another guild, raid with TMO for loot on my main, and then raid for loot in another alt guild or "allied" guild. Thanks FE/IB for clearing that up.

No one in fe has alts in in and no one in in has alts in fe

[Ella`Ella]

If OP is TMO, why was this issue taken to Server Chat, when Mazam and I discussed that we'd work towards a solution for this matter? Airing dirty laundry at a time like this is poor form on anyone's behalf.

And, Jeremy, Relborn will have consequences for ending his sentences with prepositions. I've taught, or so I though, him better.

[quido]

Tasslehof, this conversation was extremely civil until you showed up and called someone a retard. Why don't you sit this one out or have someone more intelligent and less inflammatory post on your behalf? This isn't RnF.