![]() |
|
#31
|
||||
|
Quote:
L2EQ bro
__________________
"All we really lose is one Warrior."
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#33
|
|||
|
Looks like IB catching a one week ban.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#35
|
|||
|
Post confirms anon IB forum warriors jimmies rustled getting so close to VP pixels only to be denied in the home stretch. TMO looking at the 3rd week in a row for crowns, ty PD!
__________________
[60 Phantasmist] Joystick || [60 Grandmaster] Fetal <Aftermath> | ||
|
|
|||
|
#37
|
|||
|
This just in, IB not getting free handouts.
__________________
Babyblue
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#38
|
|||
|
There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding here - no ruling has been made. The petition is back up for dispute, and will be reviewed by IB leadership as well as TMO leadership. Basically, we are back to the drawing board because TMO insists they can prove beyond a doubt they didn't train anyone.
But I guess we should just stop reviewing or allowing GM decisions to be petitioned if they have the acronym TMO in them. And again, yes - the suspension was repealed before any dragons spawned on purpose because if TMO ends up having a valid case, they shouldn't be barred from attacking targets that spawn. If TMO ends up being full of shit, they're losing more by complaining. And that's the last response I'll make on the subject, because if anyone's still crying foul at this point they are just trolling. Edit: As a side note, TMO had a number of characters camped in VP because... they were suspended from VP. Most players were afraid to log in to move their toons that were already camped out in the zone - I know this because we've been getting petitions for characters to be moved out of VP all week. This isn't exactly news or surprising. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#39
|
|||
|
# TMO CHEATS
__________________
- Shinko Was the Defiler (Blue)
- Hinko Hardmode <ALS Self Loot> Blue -Shinko Guild Leader <Safe Space> Green | ||
|
|
|||
|
#40
|
|||
|
Oh no, Hitpoint. Haha. I'm one of yours. But I still don't like you.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|