What attitudes and philosophies do you hate in P1999?

[Visual]

Originally Posted by harnold [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

4-People who think that waking up at 5AM ... is called "Competing" ... makes them superior

and the same goes for RL. Sometimes it is nothing more than the person who is willing to sacrifice the most.

Very basic principle.

[Ocelo]

Pretty much everyone in the NSFW section of the forums.

[Kutsumo]

Originally Posted by Evia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not saying I've never agreed to NBG or passed on a valuable items because I knew someone else would be better served to use it. Sometimes NBG does make sense in some scenarios and to be honest I probably agree with the concept and with using it more often then not. My problem with it is the persistent argument, and actual belief, that NBG is super fair and the most unselfish loot system. It's absolutely not. The people who generally support it and insist on using it tend to argue that it's the fairest system and that having everyone /random is super selfish and greedy. I wholeheartedly disagree and cannot comprehend that way of thinking. If you want to use NBG because you are pals and friends with everyone in the group, or because you just wanna be a nice guy/gal, then great! but don't argue that it's somehow less greedy or more fair. Logically giving everyone equal right to /random IS the only 100% fair system. Plain and simple.

Should also be considered that some classes would receive nearly nothing at certain camps if NBG was always in effect, and they'd feel resentful of inviting the class that would want to "need" the item. I see it all the time in KC, people don't want to invite the monk because they so often expect NBG on the pipe which just so happens to be one of the more valuable items for the hand camp.

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Ocelo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty much everyone in the NSFW section of the forums.

You can opt out of RNF, I can understand why people would.

[webrunner5]

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can opt out of RNF, I can understand why people would.

Yeah I can understand why the Devs let there be RnF, but wow they must have thicker skin than I have with some of the comments directed at them. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I would have pulled the plug on this server a LONG time ago lol.

[GinnasP99]

Skin like Diamond ;D

[zajurai]

-People who have names like Jednosebest or Playacleric or or Druidlol. I can't STAND those names, and people using them generally suck (although a rogue named Bakstaber was an excellent aggro manager and gave me a plat, so good job breaking my narrow worldview)

-People who think the only way to rate a class is by how viable they are in max level raids (it's one way to look at a class, sure, but if i wanted an mmo revolving around only max level content i'd go play WoW)

-Someone once refused to invite a monk into our group because they did less damage than wizards and rogues. We were around level 4 and had neither a wizard nor a rogue.

[HalflingWarrior]

#1). FIVE YEARS OF KUNARK. The servers economy, both financially and in players levels distribution is a total farce at this point.

Have fun "competing" in Velious when TMO is charging 400k for thurgadin quest armors that they're permacamping on one toon while their other 7 level 60 toons are each parked at a different raid mob.

[Cecily]

It'll start at 750K, at least. On the brightside, you have an extra few months to save.

[HalflingWarrior]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It'll start at 750K, at least. On the brightside, you have an extra few months to save.

I never have nor never will I buy an overpriced MQ from TMO