Question for GMs: Forward LNS

[MavstabYoudead]

Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That sentence doesn't really address the situation, which is why the post was made. Then someone posted a screenshot of people in a zone that added nothing.

When it is guild vs guild and a raid target is in question and someone calls LnS it needs to be more clear on how it would be handled.

If two guilds are going for trak and the big battle goes on in TT and one guild calls LnS they shouldn't be aloud to med up and then go back and attack the other guild while engaging Trak in Seb.

That obviously isn't the intent of LnS rules and it would be a bitch move if a guild used the LnS to do this.

holocaust couldn't contest fear hence it was not contested.

[HippoNipple]

Originally Posted by MavstabYoudead [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

holocaust couldn't contest fear hence it was not contested.

The point of the post was for the rule to be clearly stated for the future. You keep posting the same irrelevant shit over and over. Take a nap.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by krazyGlue [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't shit up this thread we need a clear understanding of these rules

[Pikrib]

Originally Posted by MavstabYoudead [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

false at no time did we have 7 or more players in feerott.

In large scale PvP (7 or more players on both sides), LnS must be called by a force as a whole. Individuals may not invoke Loot and Scoot. LnS may be called by the force at any time, this option may never be forfeited. If a fight took place across multiple zones, the force is considered to have finished LnS'ing once all of their players have left the zones affected. All other LnS rules still apply.

If you have 3 players in CT, 3 in Feerot and 1 in RM it is still "Force" LnS.

[Pseudechis]

The LNS rules say loot and "retreat" to safety. Moving forward to an objective is hardly "retreating".

Moving people through on groups of 3 to dodge the Force LNS when clearly each of those 3 was part of a larger force is also trying to dodge following the rules and well dodge the PVP.

Sirken it's a pretty easy one to provide guidance on, is it ok for someone To use LNS to bypass a contested zone for an objective?

[MavstabYoudead]

Originally Posted by Pikrib [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you have 3 players in CT, 3 in Feerot and 1 in RM it is still "Force" LnS.

did pvp occur in all those zones? also was holocaust contesting PoF while raid suspended?

seemed pretty "safe" in PoF Nakor.

[Widan]

Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When it is guild vs guild and a raid target is in question and someone calls LnS it needs to be more clear on how it would be handled.

It cannot be made any clearer than it already is. If you lack reading comprehension that's your issue.

Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If two guilds are going for trak and the big battle goes on in TT and one guild calls LnS they shouldn't be aloud to med up and then go back and attack the other guild while engaging Trak in Seb.

Why shouldn't they? What if pvp goes on in Erudin then one guild calls LNS and the other one ports up to Sky? Should the guild on LNS not be allowed to port up to Sky and fight them there afterwards?

If you want to lock out a group from a zone through pvp then you need to fight them in that zone, not in a zone nearby.

[Pikrib]

Originally Posted by MavstabYoudead [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

holocaust couldn't contest fear hence it was not contested.

<Fresh> was in zone and they could contest, and probably were considered part of a force+were involved in the force pvp.

Did any Fresh pvp Azrael in Fear before LnS was called? I don't think this was the case so the Azrael force could LnS into fear if they died in Feerot.

[MavstabYoudead]

did they contest? never saw 7 or more of them in fear at any point. think I saw one guy zone in periodically. saw a lot of green text from them though.

[JudgementRed]

Originally Posted by MavstabYoudead [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So sirken was the holo-fresh alliance correct in trying to dictate which zones could be used to LnS out of feerott, or were they violating the ruleset?

Since you can't even manage to read Sirken's own post in this thread ..... I'll fucking spoon-feed you the exact rule that verifies that Holocaust can dictate the zones that LNS applies.

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In large scale PvP (7 or more players on both sides), LnS must be called by a force as a whole. Individuals may not invoke Loot and Scoot. LnS may be called by the force at any time, this option may never be forfeited. If a fight took place across multiple zones, the force is considered to have finished LnS'ing once all of their players have left the zones affected. All other LnS rules still apply.

In regular PvP, you can only ever have one zone lockout active per group of players at any time. If a fight occurred across multiple zones, the winning group picks which zone the lockout will apply to.

In large scale PvP there is no limit to the number of zones a force can be locked out of. If a fight took place across multiple zones the lockout will apply to all zones a PvP related death occurred in.



https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...53&postcount=1

I keep regular office hours if you need more help with reading comprehension Madstab