Dear, anti-afk-check people, how's that AC list?

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think looking at people playing EQ as a morality issue (when it's not something like RMT that threatens this place's very existence) is the wrong way to look at it.

EQ is a system. People in that system will do what they need to do get their dopamine (pixels). The staff can and should make that system work however they want: they're putting all the time and money in, so there is no "morality" involved, just "what do the people who make this place want?"

But they've made one thing crystal clear: "what they want" is classic EverQuest. I just believe a "/list 2.0" system could achieve something closer to classic (as we'll never be able to get 100% back because of player knowledge and better internet connections and all that).

omg u actually convinced me you are 100% right [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[loramin]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well with that checked off my list, can we talk about your contributing to the wiki now?

[aspomwell]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well with that checked off my list, can we talk about your contributing to the wiki now?

For the love of God, NO!

I can ignore it on the forums, there's no ignore function in the wiki...

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by aspomwell [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For the love of God, NO!

I can ignore it on the forums, there's no ignore function in the wiki...

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[magnetaress]

I almost did, i actually made this text file

ulthork totals
SLT	WT	AC	INT	WIS	STR	STA	CHA	DEX	HP	MANA	
Brc	1	6	-1	+1	0	0	0	0	0	0
Brc	1	6	-1	+1	0	0	0	0	0	0
Hd	.6	8	0	0	3	-3	0	0	0	0
Nck	.5	7	0	0	0	0	0	0	30	-30
Glv	1.5	8	3	0	0	0	-3	0	0	0
Bts	2.5	8	0	-3	0	0	0	+3	0	0
Lgs	4	9	-3	0	0	0	+3	0	0	0
Arms	1.5	8	0	+3	0	0	0	-3	0	0
Chst	3.5	13	0	+3	0	0	-5	0	-35	+35
All	16.1	73	-5	+5	3	-3	-5	0	-5	+5

but i wasn't able to log in

[loramin]

Originally Posted by magnetaress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

but i wasn't able to log in

Try going to https://wiki.project1999.com

[Snortles Chortles]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by Snortles Chortles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not a gif but it's hurtful wards, u were warned.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

now do a bald ebony transgender hooker with a $5000 dolla weave, fungi, and 2 yaks, & fbss in the cage

Thankfully DBG provides a button that has a slow burn once it's activated. So we can avoid that instant shock.

[loramin]

Well, more automated GMing was specific [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But yeah, overall I think the staff has done, and continues to do, excellent things making this place better/more classic/more fun. When I see things I think can be improved I am not shy about saying them, but ATM I think the staff is kicking ass, and automated GMing is the only area I see obvious improvement potential in.

P.S. It's not so much an idea I want to advocate for, as it is a dream, but I would love to somehow see a split between "competitors" and "casuals". I truly think that if people could choose which style they preferred they'd have more fun with "their kind" (eg. "rotation raiders" hate having to compete with "competitors", and "competition raiders" hate having mobs "given" to others). Teal sort of accidentally created that separation ... but how to separate the two groups and keep both happy (on purpose) is a hard problem I don't have a clear answer to [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In classic this naturally happened on each server: you had a guild or three of "competitors", and they only sort of played on the same server as everyone else (they spent a ton of time in places like VP and Sleeper's that the rest of the server never saw). But here the ratios of competitors and casuals are much different, and that's why I think it would feel more classic if the two each got their own server with rules geared towards them ... but again, I have no practical suggestion for doing that well, so it's just a dream.

[Castle2.0]

Where are the replies? I see 2 pages listed, but I don't see any replies except Turbo and Apsomwell. Darn post filter Chrome extension magic!

We need more reactions on the AC list =)