Perma camp hand offs

[Pyrocat]

I think the 20 minute after server open rule prevents way way WAY more drama than it creates

[Abysis]

Depends on what you define as drama, people wanting to keep there camp yes it prevents drama for them.
Making everyone powerless and options yes that prevents drama because there is no choices to be made.

But everyone who can't get a chance to camp there items have drama, they just aren't allowed to express it or act on it.

People are unhappy they aren't allowed to complain unlike the people who didn't get their camp back or lost their camp can.

[mitic]

its day 7 in kunark and like more than another year till velious.

where is the fukin problem ?

[senna]

kunark sucks anyways.. shit doesn't even begin to get fun till velious.

[Psionide]

Everquest, aka the most brutal fucking MMO ever, go play Hello Kitty Island Adventure.

[Uthgaard]

You do have the option to compete. Of the three major camp disputes since Kunark launch, two have resulted in an attempted permacamp being lost because someone waited for the other side to slip up.

Keeping something locked down for an extended period of time takes a combination of a lot of focused players, a considerable amount of time, organization, and a lot of lost sleep. Keeping something locked down while minimizing the risk of losing it is a serious investment - one that requires the players to miss other opportunities.

If all you wanted was the option to compete, you would be competing. Instead you're investing your time into whining about exaggerated hyperbole and incorrect assumptions with no basis in fact, and that's not going to get you anything.

[Kazowi]

Originally Posted by Uthgaard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You do have the option to compete. Of the three major camp disputes since Kunark launch, two have resulted in an attempted permacamp being lost because someone waited for the other side to slip up.

Keeping something locked down for an extended period of time takes a combination of a lot of focused players, a considerable amount of time, organization, and a lot of lost sleep. Keeping something locked down while minimizing the risk of losing it is a serious investment - one that requires the players to miss other opportunities.

If all you wanted was the option to compete, you would be competing. Instead you're investing your time into whining about exaggerated hyperbole and incorrect assumptions with no basis in fact, and that's not going to get you anything.

yeah, takes a shit ton of skill to play everquest like a career virgin and keep a camp for days on end.

Sucks OP, youre playing on a blue server. Unfortunately the kids who you play with are a bunch of pansy faggots who have nothing better to do other than spend 90% of their days at fungi camp.

Come play red99 when its out brew

[casdegere]

Originally Posted by Kazowi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yeah, takes a shit ton of skill to play everquest like a career virgin and keep a camp for days on end.

Sucks OP, youre playing on a blue server. Unfortunately the kids who you play with are a bunch of pansy faggots who have nothing better to do other than spend 90% of their days at fungi camp.

Come play red99 when its out brew

Man, sometimes it really sucks when Chimps learn how to type. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Shiftin]

uthgaard for dev!

[dredge]

I just don't understand the mentality of the perma camp, locking it down to keep others from it and so on,

it's like your a bunch of children fighting over the toys in the sand-box. Why don't you all just be decent people and share the game content?

If someone's is waiting in line for a camp, how about letting them have it when your done instead of passing it off to someone else.

WTF,
when did eq turn into this whole in order to "win" I must ruin it for someone else situation?

It's really lame.

the dervs seem to support this attitude, whatever I guess I'm playing a different game then everyone else.