@ staff: Not naming names hurts the server

[Akalakamelee]

Originally Posted by Kergan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

people take this server way too seriously.

Fact.

[Koota]

Originally Posted by Akalakamelee [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fact.

[Tapatio]

Originally Posted by Smedy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

here's what happened exactly...

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
.

[Fame]

You're doors, and no one gives a fuck. I'm talkin staff posts, not more pleb life bullshit.

[Champion_Standing]

Originally Posted by Fame [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're doors, and no one gives a fuck. I'm talkin staff posts, not more pleb life bullshit.

says the pleb

[Samsung]

Originally Posted by Fame [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're doors, and no one gives a fuck. I'm talkin staff posts, not more pleb life bullshit.

Lmfao

[Syft-X]

Originally Posted by Fame [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You guys should really consider naming names when you do bans. I think Cersei's walk last night taught us all something about shame.

In addition to that, when there is no official word, rumors rule the world. This becomes a problem when you have pro level forumquesting goin on. This also comes at a time when blue to red migration is at an all-time high. The people interested in making these moves are in most cases, at least casually aware of forumquest. I would guess that at least 65% of them did some reading before making the move.

When you have stuff like: RMT, Pay-to-win, favoritism, and corruption, as a common narrative you have a problem. Especially when this server seems to be standing solely on its integrity.

Transparency would be a big move for the server. I think many would agree, without it, there is room for question.

Would it?

Promote Health of the server-Check

Maintain staff integrity by showing transparent unbiased rule enforcement-Check

Protect new players from long time scum-Check

Allow players to police the server by shunning the scumbags-Check

Destroy rumors of staff corruption- Check

Yes it would do all of these things, that's exactly why it's never gonna be done. But what's the fun in being a consistent, fair unbiased enforcer of server policy.

When it's so much more fun to log on drunk and ban 20 people you don't like based on your friends skype convo.

[syzygyst]

Originally Posted by Syft-X [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Would it?

Promote Health of the server-Check

Maintain staff integrity by showing transparent unbiased rule enforcement-Check

Protect new players from long time scum-Check

Allow players to police the server by shunning the scumbags-Check

Destroy rumors of staff corruption- Check

Yes it would do all of these things, that's exactly why it's never gonna be done. But what's the fun in being a consistent, fair unbiased enforcer of server policy.

When it's so much more fun to log on drunk and ban 20 people you don't like based on your friends skype convo.

[Doors]

I just answered the question you asked. Staff doesn't make their disciplinary actions public.

[Efwan]

Vaporize (many of his accounts), Ksah, and Littlegyno. Legit answer