@ staff: Not naming names hurts the server
 

You guys should really consider naming names when you do bans. I think Cersei's walk last night taught us all something about shame.

In addition to that, when there is no official word, rumors rule the world. This becomes a problem when you have pro level forumquesting goin on. This also comes at a time when blue to red migration is at an all-time high. The people interested in making these moves are in most cases, at least casually aware of forumquest. I would guess that at least 65% of them did some reading before making the move.

When you have stuff like: RMT, Pay-to-win, favoritism, and corruption, as a common narrative you have a problem. Especially when this server seems to be standing solely on its integrity.

Transparency would be a big move for the server. I think many would agree, without it, there is room for question.

It was vapo and dekadenz. There I just named the them for ya.

You're doors, and no one gives a fuck. I'm talkin staff posts, not more pleb life bullshit.

Would it?

Promote Health of the server-Check

Maintain staff integrity by showing transparent unbiased rule enforcement-Check

Protect new players from long time scum-Check

Allow players to police the server by shunning the scumbags-Check

Destroy rumors of staff corruption- Check

Yes it would do all of these things, that's exactly why it's never gonna be done. But what's the fun in being a consistent, fair unbiased enforcer of server policy.

When it's so much more fun to log on drunk and ban 20 people you don't like based on your friends skype convo.

says the pleb

I just answered the question you asked. Staff doesn't make their disciplinary actions public.

Vaporize (many of his accounts), Ksah, and Littlegyno. Legit answer

Lmfao

It's early

Heartbrand, handpartytowel, vaporize, brobb, novus, ksah, andis, elderan, jibeknn, sektors, dekadenz (multiple chars each) current verified list