Attn Alecta PvP Resists and Level Range

[compulsion]

Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i cant imagine a server with 4 level range, oh wait that was rallos zek lol

if you want more pvp, de guild and attack everyone. simple solution but this thread isnt about the number of pvp targets available. its about the resist system and gear/level difference of new players vs old. its also about classic mechanics.

Hmm, comparing 1900+ pop to 120ish pop. Um, no. We need all the PvP we can get.

4% difference in resist rates is what you are whining about, lol. Thanks Alecta

[SamwiseRed]

i am also for item loot. classic pvp is classic.

also i am not suggesting SZ ruleset on a FFA server. i am suggesting this server emulate rallos while teams99 emulate SZ.

[Lionfish Roundup]

4 levels imo.

I couldn't even leave OT outpost on my sk when I dinged 52, biggest reason I quit.

[Silikten]

Valid question Sam. Don't respond to all the retards it won't benefit in any way. It feels like resisting CC spells has a huge affect on level range. Everything else (fr/cr/dr/pr) seems to fit normally into resists.

4 levels was classic on TZ, I think. . . =)

[SamwiseRed]

imo of course there are two types of pvp.

Griefing is pvp in which nothing is to gain. IE logging a 60 wizard into CoM and sunstriking a level 52 back to his bindpoint. for the lulz kinda of pvp.

Contesting is pvp over something whether it be zone control, loot, or logistics IE nilly vs azrael.

griefing tends to lower the pop. I am not against it, ive dont alot of it i am just stating the facts. contesting increases pop. People see shit is going down they log on.

the 4 level range is a classic mechanics that promotes healthy pvp. i see no gain from murdereing a low 50s group in solb on your 60 main. which reminds me, remove FFA status from perma and solb...............

[SamwiseRed]

wow that post was like 20 min in the making, was farming oracle robes for newbs haha. sorry if it looks butchered.

[Dullah]

Told you long time ago levels don't mean shit in pvp.

[SamwiseRed]

ya a 52 wizard vs a 60 wizard is an even match up. same goes for any other 52 vs 60.
double backstabbing lvl 60 rogue with duelest disc is on a level playing field with a 52 rogue of same gear without any discs.

better spells, discs, ect dont matta.

surprised you would be against this. you seem to be all about classic unless it infringes on something you can take advantage of.

edit:

Originally Posted by Dullah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Monk stonestance

changed in last patch now forces all damage to be minimum instead of simply reducing damage by 75%. Even while sitting, every attack does the minimal possible damage.

Warrior precision

Discipline currently guarantees the warrior will hit their target instead of simply increasing their chance.

According to zam, its supposed to increase skill check by 50%.

you make a pvp bug posts about nerfing/buffing discs then tell me levels dont matter. okay.... not sure if srs or dum.

[Raclen]

Originally Posted by Dullah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Told you long time ago levels don't mean shit in pvp.

Same kind of person saying gear doesn't matter. Basically level 60 vp char killing a walmart geared 52 is because of skill.

This is everquest, the least skill oriented pvp mmorpg where balance is non existent. Level, gear, race and class all matter.

[Legend]

sam wants sz rulset but cant handle vt/tz ruleset

shut up sam shut the fuck up and stop crying I wish you would quit again for the 3rd time