I do have drug problems

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

OK SCIENCE, TIME TO PACK IT UP AND GO HOME, WE'VE DISCOVERED EVERYTHING, BUT THANKS

It doesn't mean you stop looking for evidence.

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by Hailto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How is it any different?

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Hailto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It doesn't mean you stop looking for evidence.

It seems that you are somehow equating acknowledging one's own lack of definitive knowledge on a subject for giving up the quest for said knowledge.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Hailto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How is it any different?

Not engaging your dipwaddery any further.

Even dawkins and hitchens can tell you what I'm talking about. You obviously haven't even read them, or watched any of their debates, much less studied agnosticism in any meaningful way. Therefore I have nothing to gain from further discourse here besides the superiority I already feel because my education was obviously far more valuable than yours, but that is only enough to only get my cock swollen but flaccid, not all the way hard, and my cock looks awesome like that, hanging all long and thick, but I can't penetrate without that rope-pushery that happens when you're turned off but trying to fuck anyway. Go read a fucking book and come back when you have something to say.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

can't penetrate without that rope-pushery that happens when you're turned off

without supposed to say with

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I made a claim but can't support it so i'll instead talk about my penis and 10 community college degrees with no job to show for them.

[Hasbinbad]

rofl k

[Hailto]

Looks bad pal.

[Hasbinbad]

I told you specific reasons why i don't take you seriously. I believe that you're either pretending ignorance or stupid, because I'm sure you've been exposed to these ideas before.

You might say *I* am the one who looks bad here, lol, but if you really can't tell me how "some dude saying they saw a hairy tall guy in the woods" is different than wondering at the origin of things beyond the horizon of our universe, I absolutely don't give a shit what you say. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Hailto]

There is no more evidence for the hairy tall guy in the woods, than there is for the existence of a deity. Why do you feel comfortable saying big foot doesn't exist, but you don't feel comfortable when faced with the same evidence for god's existence?

The scope of the question should not affect how you view the evidence.