![]() |
|
#141
|
||||
|
Quote:
As for Hasbinbad, its hard to get a true gauge for the feeling of a issue based purely on private communication. You need an open forum to discuss those things, and that is the point of the boards. If the server staff made a mistake, openly is the place to have the discussion about it. Keeping things private and veiled is what will ultimately break P99. We saw this 5x on VZ/TZ with 3 or 4 completely different sets of players. Transparency is the best policy, pure and simple. And you have to create a set of rules, and hold to them like a crack fiend holds onto his last rock. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#142
|
|||
|
Not like we can point a finger back at the players for ivandyr hooping mobs and not agreeing to a boss kill rotation or anything. That doesn't screw anything up.
It's always the fault of "Blizz"/"Trion"/"Whoever", it's never, ever the scum bag community that screws up the... community... wait.. I see ... what I did there. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#143
|
|||
|
out the hackers and ban them.
/end thread | ||
|
|
|||
|
#144
|
||||
|
Quote:
Using what's available to take down a mob isn't the problem. If it's not meant to be it'll be changed. If it's considered an exploit, then that communication needs to happen so that everyone is aware. Not agreeing to rotations isnt' the problem. Would an overall agreement make things easier for all involved? Of course it would. But that wasn't the issue here. The issue was a decision made on how to punish cheaters and hackers. A decision that wasn't in line with how other cheaters and hackers have been punished in the past. Some people it seems, feel that the GM's decision on this matter shouldn't be questioned or looked at more closely, while there are others that feel quite differently on the subject.
__________________
India - cleric
Labyrrinth - enchanter | |||
|
|
||||
|
#145
|
|||
|
i got teh solution!
enforce boss rotation on blue99 if you dont like that, join red99
__________________
Mitic<Transatlantic Nihilum> | ||
|
|
|||
|
#146
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Franswa | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#147
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
One guild was raid suspended for their leadership using a 3rd party program One was not Those are the facts. Not your opinion. Fact. Quote:
| ||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
#148
|
|||
|
Just ban all the poopsocking morons and be done with it
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#149
|
|||
|
I can tell you that it was a rough time when Dark Ascension was suspended for a week when a one member was caught using MQ in Lower Guk, while our raid force was in Sol B. Dark Ascension was also referred to as a guild who harboured cheaters by the staff, and during this time a guide allowed for the ALT's of IB to create a guild called Dark Suspension. Very Mature~
It's ironic how the tables have turned. In memory of DA - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmBBNFzWN9k
__________________
Durison - 60 Extinct Warlord
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#150
|
|||
|
I read the first post. That's all. Here is what I think of it:
Between the cheating, half-assed punishments, and disdain for dissenting opinions, well, new players should be scared of this server. And frankly, as a member of a community one has a responsibility to question the decisions of its leaders when those decisions are, for whatever reason, unpredictable and inconsistent. Of course, they've said before that this is their place and theirs alone, players be damned, but that rings a bit hollow when multitudes of cheaters go on playing because they've become an entity too big to fail. Like CitiGroup, but with more back acne. Personally, I won't participate in a server where cheaters are allowed to keep playing, nor will I participate in discussions where I am selectively censored in order to dupe prospective players into joining what they think is a server not suffering these ills. This thread is as vile a piece of propaganda as it accuses others of perpetrating. It is blatant trolling and should be moved to RnF else it is lent credibility. I would question why it hasn't been moved already, but I'm not sure to whom I would pose the query without offending Hasbin's gentle sensibilities. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|