Is Donald Trump unintelligent or just dishonest?

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

That's the falsest, false equivalency ever. Of all time.

[James_Joyce]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you guys call looking at the surface, without the content facts.

Like this is the math 1+2-4+3 = 2

and you go off and say 1+2= 2

Does this make senes? use the left part of your brain that helped you come up with your defense as to what trump 'meant' when he said thousands of muslims were cheering at 9/11 to fucking figure out my point, ya animals.

so what im getting from this is that indeed, facks and basic rithmuhdick do indeed be rayciss.


[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Pokesan]

yours are

[iruinedyourday]

hmm I'm trying to figure out how to explain it clearly.. but basically its like, there are A WHOLE BUNCH OF CAUSES as to why the facts you think are racist, are facts at all..

like the war on drugs, if you look at it objectively, you see WHY black people are targeted, and you see how black people being targeted causes more black people to be targeted because of the results of being targeted in the first place.

its like the chicken and the egg, only we have the ability to objectively figure out which came first.

but instead, we are just saying KILL THE CHICKEN EAT THE EGGS WHO CARES

continue using the parts of your left brain that manage to work when you are defending trump

[James_Joyce]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hmm I'm trying to figure out how to explain it clearly.. but basically its like, there are A WHOLE BUNCH OF CAUSES as to why the facts you think are racist, are facts at all..

like the war on drugs, if you look at it objectively, you see WHY black people are targeted, and you see how black people being targeted causes more black people to be targeted because of the results of being targeted in the first place.

its like the chicken and the egg, only we have the ability to objectively figure out which came first.

but instead, we are just saying KILL THE CHICKEN EAT THE EGGS WHO CARES

continue using the parts of your left brain that manage to work when you are defending trump

Yeah okay but what I was really looking for was for you to quote like below and compliment me on my skillful wordplay today. that is an original thing I just made up:

Originally Posted by James_Joyce [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

rithmuhdick

also I just noticed when quoting it that the post number is 2133666. it's really quite an exquisite post.

[Lurikeen]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

like the war on drugs, if you look at it objectively, you see WHY black people are targeted, and you see how black people being targeted causes more black people to be targeted because of the results of being targeted in the first place.

Yeah, man. Like.. they targeted black people which caused more targeting of black people... and soon enough even more black people were targeted causing more to be targeted, but that wasn't good enough so they started targeting the targeting of black people and with targets being targeted for targeting, it was a wholesale war on targeting the targets of targeting targeting black people who were being targeted for being targets. Man, your revelation is heavy dude.

[Oooruk]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good or evil aside, Adolf Hitler was one of the greatest leaders in the history of the planet. Nobody before or since had taken a nation in such shambles and brought it up to global superpower in less than a decade.

It took communism and capitalism teaming up to take that power out.

Not really. The business community of the United States LOVED Hitler and his fascism because it was essentially an extreme form of capitalism. In fact American companies continued to support the the Nazi regime well after Roosevelt had made it illegal to do so.

You also have to remember that the Wests' (Britain + USA) main strategy in WWII was to let the Germans and Russians destroy each other. Hitler's worst mistake was to turn on Russia, this essentially insured the destruction of Nazi Germany. Once mutual destruction had been completed, the West moved in to clean up the remnants of the German army (the storming of Normandy). The Russians defeated the Germans, not Britain and not the USA

Originally Posted by Lurikeen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, man. Like.. they targeted black people which caused more targeting of black people... and soon enough even more black people were targeted causing more to be targeted, but that wasn't good enough so they started targeting the targeting of black people and with targets being targeted for targeting, it was a wholesale war on targeting the targets of targeting targeting black people who were being targeted for being targets. Man, your revelation is heavy dude.

I don't know if you've ever examined anything critically but a quick look at the "War on Drugs" will surely reveal itself to be a "War on the Poor".

[James_Joyce]

Originally Posted by Oooruk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hitler's worst mistake was to turn on Russia, this essentially insured the destruction of Nazi Germany

This is how I know you don't know shit about WW2.

Germany and the Soviet Union both knew that their ideologies were mutually exclusive. Both were planning on the destruction of the other. Stalin was purging and doing all of his crazy shit to get the Soviet empire into fighting shape.

Hitler pre-emptively struck Soviet troops which were massing for invasion along the German-Soviet border. There was no "poking the bear" or grand mistake like you learned in middle school. There was strike first, or be struck. If Germany hadn't made an effort to be on the offensive and burning Soviet capital cities before they could organize for war, Germany never would have stood a chance against the Soviets, who had the benefit of vast material support from abroad when compared with Germany.

This entire mythos stems from the Germany as a mad dog fabrication. Germany neither instigated WW2 nor made insane, rabid aggressive decisions. The country was backed into a corner, like every country is that attempts to govern based on the will of its people instead of the will of international finance. Crazy shit started going down as Nazi gains evaporated and the imminent destruction and death of the entire fascist regime became evident, but the idea that they were a collective of drooling bloodthirsty maniacs from 1933 on is war propaganda for the lowest common denominator.

[Oooruk]

Originally Posted by James_Joyce [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is how I know you don't know shit about WW2.

Germany and the Soviet Union both knew that their ideologies were mutually exclusive. Both were planning on the destruction of the other. Stalin was purging and doing all of his crazy shit to get the Soviet empire into fighting shape.

Hitler pre-emptively struck Soviet troops which were massing for invasion along the German-Soviet border. There was no "poking the bear" or grand mistake like you learned in middle school. There was strike first, or be struck. If Germany hadn't made an effort to be on the offensive and burning Soviet capital cities before they could organize for war, Germany never would have stood a chance against the Soviets, who had the benefit of vast material support from abroad when compared with Germany.

This entire mythos stems from the Germany as a mad dog fabrication. Germany neither instigated WW2 nor made insane, rabid aggressive decisions. The country was backed into a corner, like every country is that attempts to govern based on the will of its people instead of the will of international finance.

Oh my.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by James_Joyce [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This entire mythos stems from the Germany as a mad dog fabrication. Germany neither instigated WW2 nor made insane, rabid aggressive decisions. The country was backed into a corner, like every country is that attempts to govern based on the will of its people instead of the will of international finance. Crazy shit started going down as Nazi gains evaporated and the imminent destruction and death of the entire fascist regime became evident, but the idea that they were a collective of drooling bloodthirsty maniacs from 1933 on is war propaganda for the lowest common denominator.

Bingo. Most of the "lore and legend of the mad dog" are little extracts and anecdotes selectively taken out of context, with the intent to make people gawk bug-eyed and shiver and shake with a wool blanket wrapped around them at midnight by the fireplace when watching their Talmudvision documentary on A&E.

Believe this phenomenon is referred to as worshiping the "Idol of Terror" according to the Old Testament. Deriving pleasure and a sense of security in their homes from being spoonfed a concentrated microcosm of some bad stuff.