Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #211  
Old 06-07-2013, 07:46 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Man, it isn't worth it. There has been essentially several thread like this the past couple weeks with the same shit being spewed back and forth. Most I would like to point out, with no credible sources and anything from most people to consider a credible source in this argument is wikipedia, half the time to a page that isn't even relevant. I have come to a conclusion though from all of this. Atheists are stupid.

oh and

2013, deal with it.
atheism is the next evolution of christianity just like eating pork and drinking beer is the next evolution is islam (remember, we had a 1000 year head start on them).
  #212  
Old 06-07-2013, 07:46 PM
Daldolma Daldolma is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i'm pretty sure marriage already meets this definition, even without any revisions
it's complicated. on the state level, many definitions include language that prohibits marriage between anyone other than a man and a woman. federally, with DOMA overturned, there's no restrictive definition, but there are a variety of federal laws that make no sense for homosexual couples as they were written with hetero marriage in mind.

it was a pervasive assumption that permeated through all levels of law
  #213  
Old 06-07-2013, 07:50 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
it's complicated. on the state level, many definitions include language that prohibits marriage between anyone other than a man and a woman. federally, with DOMA overturned, there's no restrictive definition, but there are a variety of federal laws that make no sense for homosexual couples as they were written with hetero marriage in mind.

it was a pervasive assumption that permeated through all levels of law
the problem is that all of these laws are recent. as in written in the last 20 years. homophobes redefined marriage to exclude same sex relations. now it's time to undo their damage.
  #214  
Old 06-07-2013, 07:52 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Most I would like to point out, with no credible sources and anything from most people to consider a credible source in this argument is wikipedia, half the time to a page that isn't even relevant.
don't be angry with wikipedia because doma was ruled unconstitutional [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #215  
Old 06-07-2013, 07:58 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
so now you're against single parents, too? or is the legality of single parent families another exception?
Everyone with a brain is against single parents. It's pretty fucking obvious that two people are going to do a better job at most things than one, and parenting is no exception. A quick google reveals a boatload of studies that children from single parent homes are more violetn, more likely to be abused, more likely to be incarcerated when adults, more likely to be fat, more likely to do drugs, less likely to do well in school, etc. The fairy tale of the brave single mom is just that: a fairy tale.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
  #216  
Old 06-07-2013, 08:00 PM
Eliseus Eliseus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
don't be angry with wikipedia because doma was ruled unconstitutional [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What does doma have to do with anything. Hence someone linking a wikipedia page the was irrelevant. Apparently that link made what I said wrong right? Exactly, shut the fuck up, again.
  #217  
Old 06-07-2013, 08:02 PM
Eliseus Eliseus is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 309
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Everyone with a brain is against single parents. It's pretty fucking obvious that two people are going to do a better job at most things than one, and parenting is no exception. A quick google reveals a boatload of studies that children from single parent homes are more violetn, more likely to be abused, more likely to be incarcerated when adults, more likely to be fat, more likely to do drugs, less likely to do well in school, etc. The fairy tale of the brave single mom is just that: a fairy tale.
QFT! Seriously

Inb4 kagatobs comes back with some irrelevant crap like genital mutilation.
  #218  
Old 06-07-2013, 08:04 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What does doma have to do with anything. Hence someone linking a wikipedia page the was irrelevant. Apparently that link made what I said wrong right? Exactly, shut the fuck up, again.
there's been a lot of discussion about changing the definition of marriage, but the definition of marriage was actually changed by doma in 1996 to try to define marriage as opposite sex only. it didn't work. doma is clearly pertinent to the discussion.

moran.
  #219  
Old 06-07-2013, 08:05 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Everyone with a brain is against single parents. It's pretty fucking obvious that two people are going to do a better job at most things than one, and parenting is no exception. A quick google reveals a boatload of studies that children from single parent homes are more violetn, more likely to be abused, more likely to be incarcerated when adults, more likely to be fat, more likely to do drugs, less likely to do well in school, etc. The fairy tale of the brave single mom is just that: a fairy tale.
this post supports same sex households for adoptive parents. i do not disagree.
  #220  
Old 06-07-2013, 08:06 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
QFT! Seriously

Inb4 kagatobs comes back with some irrelevant crap like genital mutilation.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.