rape jokes

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by hasbinharrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Once again you won't see animals literally beating the crap out of each other to the point of unconsciousness then proceeding to 'rape' the corpse. Doesn't happen. Ever. What you are witnessing and what is proposed are different measures of courtship.

Originally Posted by hasbinharrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Say you are right. If this was the nature of animals on a constant basis then nothing would reproduce and survive.

Just stop posting.

Originally Posted by hasbinharrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The evolutionary process depends on the dominant male winning the 'courtship' of the female. It is the same reason that 99% of the P99 population has yet to touch a girl. None of you are 'evolutionary fit' to any female in your lives. This is why, much like the homosexuals of early 1900's, must resort to justifying 'rape' by exaggerated and opinionated examples in nature.

...you really should of stopped while you were simply behind, now you're lost.

[Toodles]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Watch your own video again and actually figure out what the guy was actually defending.


It's not about "supporting rape jokes" it's about supporting freedom of speech and a comedians right to talk about whatever the fuck he or she wants to and while double standards.

You do realize that comedy is funny because it's always as someone's expense, that's kind of the essence of the whole idea. If you start to censor comedians and tell them what they can and cannot say in a vacuum, you're opening up an entire can of worms that nobody wants opened.

For crying out loud, I'm an animal activist and even I chuckled a bit the first time that I heard someone say "A seal walks into a club.". It's comedy, the only thing it promotes and perpetuates is laughter, if you believe otherwise then you would agree with the universal disbanding of all art and entertainment forms because you can argue the exact same BS about music, print, video, games, etc..

While I agree with your sentiment (to some extent) about the use of freedom of speech - how would you feel or react if the subject was concerning animals?

Animal activists often tend to be loonies these days, who want to hurt other humans for 'hurting' animals.

I often wonder how I can listen or believe in someone who would put the well being of a Macaw before that of a child.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Toodles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Animal activists often tend to be loonies these days, who want to hurt other humans for 'hurting' animals.

I often wonder how I can listen or believe in someone who would put the well being of a Macaw before that of a child.

That's another jump though, you go from the idea of wanting to hurt humans that hurt animals to the idea of choosing an animal over a child (assuming the child wasn't the one hurting the animals).

Two very different things.

Go look up some videos of the Japanese dolphin industry and watch some asshole slit the throats of those creatures for a while and tell me you wouldn't want to slit his throat. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Kagatob]

^ Because rape is worse than murder. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Kagatob]

^ Detraction failed.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by hasbinharrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

^ Intelligence absent.

Projection detected.

[Toodles]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's another jump though, you go from the idea of wanting to hurt humans that hurt animals to the idea of choosing an animal over a child (assuming the child wasn't the one hurting the animals).

Two very different things.

Not to Ted Nugent they aren't - or any hunters for that matter that get letters daily saying their children will be raped and mutilated because he -in effect- killed Bambi.

Or 'activists' who blow up research centers that are finding cures for fatal infant diseases, by testing on rats.

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Go look up some videos of the Japanese dolphin industry and watch some asshole slit the throats of those creatures for a while and tell me you wouldn't want to slit his throat. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You brought up your involvement with activism as if that was some credential, and I failed to see why.

[Kagatob]

Oh I see, you think all animal activists = eco-terrorists.

They don't.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Lojik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hmmm... I wonder if two phrases that use completely different words can still infer the same thing.

Infer is the wrong word here.

But to answer your question, no they can't. Synonyms mean similar, but not identical things.

[Hasbinbad]

You imply something, I infer things from it.