Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-16-2009, 11:46 PM
Blaine Brokenhammer Blaine Brokenhammer is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Default

You better bring it Gildiss if you think your gonna KS Korvax the Cursed from a druid...fucking noob....remember that tell....? I do .....

There's your Gildiss Gram of the day.....

Blaine Brokenhammer
  #12  
Old 12-16-2009, 11:48 PM
Dartagnan Dartagnan is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"Can't wait until we are on rotation with 4 or more guilds. We'll see how you like that."

I'm not in IB or Trans. I have friends in both guilds, and there are people I dislike in both. I mention that just to indicate my neutrality.

Let's be realistic here--there is *no* solution which will make everyone happy in the scenario I quoted. If you leave it FFA, and if guild 1 really IS the best, well, then you end up with 1 happy guild and 3 guilds full of people who get bored and probably quit playing. Put it on a rotation, and everyone is left somewhat unhappy. Old EQ has problems, and lack of sufficient content at the high-end is one of its worst. This guild trouble makes that problem brutally clear.

That you worked harder than the competition means you got to farm content for weeks before they began to catch up. That's the payoff your work earned. Surely you can't realistically expect to have maintained full lockdown even after another guild (or more) got up and running? No, I know you're more reasonable than to even suggest that. So, what did you expect to happen, realistically?

Danth
Hi Danth. No, that is not my reasoning. It's may the best guild win. I think it's possible for Transcendence to get its act together and be on competing level. I think it's possible for any group of players to get together and challenge any top guild.

Putting guilds on rotation eliminates this. It allows groups of people to put minimal effort. Of course Transcendence, in its current form, is happy with this. Wouldn't you be if you were in that guild? You don't have to do anything except accomplish your goals for that day that you are assigned and the spawn/plane is just given to you regardless of whether or not you earned it.

Then comes a third guild that wants in on the action. Cut the pie some more and so forth. I hope you'd see where I am getting at.

Transcendence is using this as a way to break IB up too. If they were in our position they'd feel the same way.
  #13  
Old 12-16-2009, 11:50 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That you worked harder than the competition means you got to farm content for weeks before they began to catch up. That's the payoff your work earned. Surely you can't realistically expect to have maintained full lockdown even after another guild (or more) got up and running? No, I know you're more reasonable than to even suggest that. So, what did you expect to happen, realistically?

Danth
Danth, I don't know if you were around at the time, but right as we became raid ready (well before anyone else), the server was experiencing ddos, server xfer, and many of the mobs and areas were buggy or broken.

When that settles down, all the sudden big zerg wants a piece as if they were equals. Look, I detail all of this in other posts. You should check it out before you stick yer nose in poop.
  #14  
Old 12-17-2009, 12:01 AM
Greldor Greldor is offline
Skeleton


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16
Default

Seriously, all this QQing about "zerging". . .


We have an active player count of 200-300 at any given time. The encounters were tailored to 72 person raids. So, with our game experience this can be done with much less.


What constitutes "Zerging?"

Having more members show up?

Having more members?

Why do you care how many people shows up for a guild event?

Are you jealous?

Do you have different preferences in guild recruitment?

Do you need to recruit more?

Again, why do you care?

I guess I just don't understand how having a lot of guildies online and ready to help on a low population server is a bad thing, or dishonorable, or whatever you people think it is.
__________________
Greldor Demortalius
Ogre Shadowknight
  #15  
Old 12-17-2009, 12:08 AM
Danth Danth is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,272
Default

"The encounters were tailored to 72 person raids."

That's Planes of Power. Pre-expansion raids were, depending on the zone, anywhere from ~1 groupable (Fear trash) to 24-30 people or so, to unkillable (latter half of Plane of Sky). Just a slight correction!

Hasbin: I've been here since day 2. I'm well aware that much of the content you faced was broken. I've encountered plenty of broken content myself, even outside raids. Being a sort of beta tester was always part and parcel for the EQ bleeding edge. That's not to say it's right or fair, but rather, pragmatically it should be expected.

Dartagnan: You're right, as more guilds come up, EQ's lack of high-end content will only become more or a problem. However, I do not see any system fully solving that problem to everyone's satisfaction.

Danth
  #16  
Old 12-17-2009, 12:10 AM
Zexa Zexa is offline
Kobold

Zexa's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fine Steel Long Swords
Posts: 137
Default

Greldor you're right. If I ever use it, I use it in jest. The way guilds govern themselves is something completely up to them. Trans is far from a zerg guild. It could be used jokingly given the ratio of guild membership to the server population, but not in membership versus content. Winning is winning. I've been on a 100 man Avatar of War raid(Now that was a zerg!).

Did someone else use zerg or was that extracted from my picture post? That was mostly targeted to Supreme(the leadership) being a retard and still flourishing.
  #17  
Old 12-17-2009, 12:10 AM
Blaine Brokenhammer Blaine Brokenhammer is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Default

Zerging refers to a guild that has such little skill/quality players in it that thier only answer to beating an encounter is invite more people....
  #18  
Old 12-17-2009, 12:16 AM
Dartagnan Dartagnan is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"The encounters were tailored to 72 person raids."

That's Planes of Power. Pre-expansion raids were, depending on the zone, anywhere from ~1 groupable (Fear trash) to 24-30 people or so, to unkillable (latter half of Plane of Sky). Just a slight correction!

Hasbin: I've been here since day 2. I'm well aware that much of the content you faced was broken. I've encountered plenty of broken content myself, even outside raids. Being a sort of beta tester was always part and parcel for the EQ bleeding edge. That's not to say it's right or fair, but rather, pragmatically it should be expected.

Dartagnan: You're right, as more guilds come up, EQ's lack of high-end content will only become more or a problem. However, I do not see any system fully solving that problem to everyone's satisfaction.

Danth
I think it depends on how you look at it. Instead of QQing to the GMs to set up a forced rotation, maybe Transcendence should look at WHY they are falling behind.

Transcendence should have been the top on the server had they been able to level up faster and bring together their people. They were by far the first up and coming guild at the beginning. Instead, IB is being punished for being better organized.

Instead of all this rotation crap, maybe they should look at the reasons WHY they are failing and then improve them. By QQing to Wenai and Aeolwind, they literally are pointing the finger and saying this guild is too good, please help us because we are not willing to improve ourselves.

The server is still young that any group of individuals who are dedicated could seriously compete with us and you know what? We would welcome it instead of this rotation garbage.
Last edited by Dartagnan; 12-17-2009 at 12:19 AM..
  #19  
Old 12-17-2009, 12:18 AM
Greldor Greldor is offline
Skeleton


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaine Brokenhammer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Zerging refers to a guild that has such little skill/quality players in it that thier only answer to beating an encounter is invite more people....
I don't understand how that can be any sort of intelligent stance concerning another guild. That basically negates the legitimacy of every family guild I have ever raided with.

That notion is absolutely ridiculous.
__________________
Greldor Demortalius
Ogre Shadowknight
Last edited by Greldor; 12-17-2009 at 12:22 AM..
  #20  
Old 12-17-2009, 01:03 AM
Blaine Brokenhammer Blaine Brokenhammer is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greldor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't understand how that can be any sort of intelligent stance concerning another guild. That basically negates the legitimacy of every family guild I have ever raided with.

That notion is absolutely ridiculous.

Family guilds have a place in the game...sadly for them they dont play the same game as skilled players....
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.