![]() |
|
#131
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#132
|
|||
|
Anything that keeps people from killing the handsome bouncer in Oggok has my vote.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#133
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm also confident plants don't need us for carbon dioxide, we only need them for oxygen. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#134
|
||||
|
Quote:
They are spending money out of their pockets to provide you something for free. Be thankful, or move on. I'm fairly new to this server and even I know that. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#135
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#136
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#137
|
||||
|
Quote:
same reason people make hacks and stuff for games. as nilbog said, they dont actually need us at all. as for the guard topic. that shit had to be changed, i could make 800pp an hour and do a 40+ level in 4 hours by soloing guards with zero risk. that shit was unbalanced. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#138
|
||||
|
Quote:
As for your reasoning-grasping, when guards are better than, or as good as, everything else in the game, and easier; even though everyone has access to them, they're unbalanced with relation to the game. Another quote, Yendorlootmonkey: I care that this was changed ahead of schedule because it was "broken" as admitted by Verant, yet class-based XP penalties are left in even though they were "broken" as admitted by Verant, and I'm wondering why this is so. Guards're broken on a rational level as well as "as admitted by Verant." Exp penalties, however, make sense on a rational level for hybrids, esp. in classic where Knights are used as tanks in raids (I suppose I'd agree that rangers do not deserve exp penalties, but they serve to dissuade people from playing rangers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] ). Also, Verant made the hybrid exp change to try to get more people to play the game, I believe, the guard change to save the economy. We're more interested in the economy, since there's no product being sold. Verant also added mercs and other things to make the game easy-mode to attract customers, we do not want these. Just because you use the words "broken as admitted by Verant" twice, does not mean they're equal things. Your analogy is a fallacy because you're equating things that aren't actually equal.
__________________
Accersitus Mage
Ennui Monk Vita mid 40s Cleric | |||
|
Last edited by Noleafclover; 07-15-2010 at 03:41 AM..
|
|
|||
|
#139
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Accersitus Mage
Ennui Monk Vita mid 40s Cleric | |||
|
|
||||
|
#140
|
|||
|
whoever is saying they can make 1.2k an hour as a monk on guards is just telling fibs.
my level 46 pet in grobb kills guards way faster than a monk would with zero down time and instant pulling. can kill 9 guards in the 6 min respawn time. in grobb every guard drops a longsword that sells for 12pp (11.8 but meh ill say 12) every time, which makes it better than oggok who drop fine steal which is 6pp per fs and some times only drops 1. so every 6 mins thats 108pp, so 1080pp for the hour assuming you dont get any unlucky charm breaks and need to zone which do happen. so 800 - 900pp for the hour is pretty much the max you can get on guards. monks are telling lies [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|