Nocturne

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The bible cannot prove the bible, the bible cannot prove god. Where's your evidence?

He does not need the bible to prove anything about God. That was his point. It is self evident. You are trying to disprove an axiom here. You are saying that o+o = 1. The big bang is like a half truth only people's ego wont allow them to see the whole truth. I mean even if we look at the physics of it you have to have a cause before an effect. Before everything there would be no time. Causality exist in relation to time. For there to be a bang/first cause you have to introduce time or a cause. Life or existence or the universe is the effect, God is the cause. The prime mover.

The fine tuning of the universe is the evidence of a maker. The constants for the laws of the universe are so narrowly defined that if they were changed even minutely life would not exist.

If people base their ideas on lack of knowledge and half truths that is their deal. I cant help it if people cant humble themselves to believe in a God because they lack the imagination to ponder something that is so great and nearly unknowable that you have reduced it to a fairy tale about a man in the clouds with a beard wagging a finger.

[gotrocks]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

<3


continue on with your regular scheduled shit throwing.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Nocturne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The law of biogenesis states that evolution and abiogenesis are impossible.

The "law" of biogenesis was developed by a dude trying to disprove the idea that rats were created because you left lint and crumbs in a pile with bits of string, which was the prevailing notion at the time (spontaneous generation), and has absolutely nothing to do with the conversation about the first life on earth. It is a useful concept, but is not what you're making it out to be.

[Hasbinbad]

Don't get me wrong, it was ground breaking work that made a lot of things obvious after understanding it, but it doesn't have the import you're saying it does.

[Hitchens]

If god were to use his design for the human body on his resume, no self respecting engineering firm would hire him. Our sinuses and genitals alone are enough to send god packing back to McDonalds.

[Hitchens]

Originally Posted by Nocturne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How the fuck can you even say that

Pretty easily. I strike certain keys and the words appear.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He does not need the bible to prove anything about God. That was his point. It is self evident.

It's not self evident, it's self evident to him because he has an extremely narrow pre-determined view of the universe. Something is amazing ergo god. Something is amazing ergo faeries, something is amazing ergo flying spaghetti monster. What's the difference?

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Nocturne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How the fuck can you even say that considering if you were to take a team of 1 million of the smartest people in the world, they still couldn't produce anything with even 1/10th the complexity. Its statements like this that make me wonder if we were to open up your skull, would we find an actual brain or a pile of shit. Our bodies are so complex that even after thousands of years of studying it we still don't fully understand it.

I use the same pathway to breathe that I do to eat and drink, that lets me choke. Intelligent design. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Hitchens]

Gives our species pores, invents things to clog them. Thanks god.

[Hasbinbad]

Gives people the miracle of birth.

Invents depleted uranium so that babies can be born without eyes.

Thanks God.