Not even sure why the Devs put up with all this

[nilbog]

Ill keep this short since I'm using my phone, but we set rules inspired by classic eq. It is within the power of the people to dethrone by collaboration. We shouldn't need to interfere..but hopefully a simulated patch day respawn addition will help in regards to raid npcs. Also, don't believe everything u read on the forums.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ill keep this short since I'm using my phone, but we set rules inspired by classic eq. It is within the power of the people to dethrone by collaboration. We shouldn't need to interfere..but hopefully a simulated patch day respawn addition will help in regards to raid npcs. Also, don't believe everything u read on the forums.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ill keep this short since I'm using my phone, but we set rules inspired by classic eq. It is within the power of the people to dethrone by collaboration. We shouldn't need to interfere..but hopefully a simulated patch day respawn addition will help in regards to raid npcs. Also, don't believe everything u read on the forums from certain people.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ill keep this short since I'm using my phone, but we set rules inspired by classic eq. It is within the power of the people to dethrone by collaboration. We shouldn't need to interfere..but hopefully a simulated patch day respawn addition will help in regards to raid npcs. Also, don't believe everything u read on the forums.

Variance specifically favors the zerg.

[Uggme]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ill keep this short since I'm using my phone, but we set rules inspired by classic eq. It is within the power of the people to dethrone by collaboration. We shouldn't need to interfere...

Shouldn't need to - This I understand. But I do recall during my classic experience that the Devs DID interfere when necessary.

I frankly find it disturbingly petty and childish for a group of people to dominate a freely run project. I seriously envision a group of children in the sandbox hogging all of the toy trucks and neat action figures. Instead of sharing and having fun with everyone, they ask the other kids for a piece of candy in return for a broken hotwheel.

It might not be as bad as it looks while reading RnF, but if a person or guild is mucking up the place, don't you feel it would be for the betterment of your own project to intervene?

Just a thought [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] oh and dude - seriously do love this place thus far. You and your team have gone above and beyond for this project. /clap

[Skope]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ill keep this short since I'm using my phone, but we set rules inspired by classic eq. It is within the power of the people to dethrone by collaboration. We shouldn't need to interfere..but hopefully a simulated patch day respawn addition will help in regards to raid npcs. Also, don't believe everything u read on the forums.

nilbog, but extending the variance has only worsened some of this.

Simulated patch days are great as it's the only semblance of the true EQ raiding spirit this server has (once every few months...), but that's only one problem here.

The variance, from the beginning, was set to deter the exact behavior that's happening now with the notion that nobody would would partake in poopsocks & whatever else, yet that's exactly what's been happening since the Spring of 2010. Surely three years of a failed experiment (coincidentally, some of the people pushing for that variance ended up getting nicked for SEQ) is enough to conclude that it's failed.

Instead of twisting the classic raid scene to benefit a tiny portion of the idiotic population - that happens to cause you the majority of the problems - it might be a good idea to actually implement classic rules. Just sayin'

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ill keep this short since I'm using my phone, but we set rules inspired by classic eq. It is within the power of the people to dethrone by collaboration. We shouldn't need to interfere..but hopefully a simulated patch day respawn addition will help in regards to raid npcs. Also, don't believe everything u read on the forums.

p99 variance = non-classic mechanic that greatly favors the zerg and in fact incentivizes zerging over competing

let's be real, tmo is the squeaky wheel. actually fixing endgame to match classic would cause too many headaches when they nerdrage

[Godefroi]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

we set rules inspired by classic eq

With all due respect, kunark didn't last 2 years, with guilds training each other to keep them from unlocking content. Worst, no guild were retarded enough to "sell" content for platinium like TMO does.

I'm all in for "dethroning" by uniting, it's what makes EQ great, but saying you don't want to involve yourself to respect classic EQ rules is totally biaised, since progression on classic was high, and it isn't at all on p99, that where the binds between classic EQ and P99 stops.

Thank god ST is a CSR zone.

[vulzol]

Originally Posted by Godefroi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

With all due respect, kunark didn't last 2 years, with guilds training each other to keep them from unlocking content. Worst, no guild were retarded enough to "sell" content for platinium like TMO does.

I'm all in for "dethroning" by uniting, it's what makes EQ great, but saying you don't want to involve yourself to respect classic EQ rules is totally biaised, since progression on classic was high, and it isn't at all on p99, that where the binds between classic EQ and P99 stops.

Thank god ST is a CSR zone.

So you've noticed all the TMO selling epics in EC? They're basically doing all the content and expecting everybody else to pay them for it. Where does all this plat go?

[Clark]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ill keep this short since I'm using my phone, but we set rules inspired by classic eq. It is within the power of the people to dethrone by collaboration. We shouldn't need to interfere..but hopefully a simulated patch day respawn addition will help in regards to raid npcs. Also, don't believe everything u read on the forums.

Flooding server with items though. We never got this for IB/DA/Transcendence. Although I do like nothing being in window for 3 days afterwards. Less of a time sink in regards to sitting on boss spawns and tracking.