Senate fails the country again.

[Black Jesus]

I already told you why these polls are retarded as fuck.

It's the same deal when you buy a gun online, it isn't just next-day shipped straight to your door. You have to send it to a FFL dealer, fill out a Form 4473, and pass a NICS background check before they will release it to you. Some states even have waiting periods.

Let me re-iterate: We've already had these laws on the books since 1968. It seems to me you are the one problems with reading comprehension problems.

[Stinkum]

So once again, I irrefutably prove you wrong. Once again, you ignore that fact and then change the goal post.

You're a weasel. That's your entire modus operandi.

I'll take your constant evasions as a concession of defeat.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Nune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Making semi-automatic weapons illegal to own or purchase is NOT disarming people, says the person calling someone else retarded.

Scurry back to your Huffingtonpost blog comments where ignorant liberal remarks go to be [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The part in bold isn't even close to being attempted so stop getting your panties in a bunch over crap you are making up. Background checks do not make anything illegal.

Even if they did 'ban' military style assault weapons that would not make semi-automatic weapons illegal, only certain envisioned/designed/tested to kill humans during every step of their creation assault weapons.

For someone who is presenting themselves as pro-gun you really know little about weaponry.

[Black Jesus]

Originally Posted by Stinkum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So once again, I irrefutably prove you wrong. Once again, you ignore that fact and then change the goal post.

You're a weasel. That's your entire modus operandi.

I'll take your constant evasions as a concession of defeat.

Yea the people agree with background checks. GOOD THING WE ALREADY HAVE THEM HUH. I'd like to keep guns out of your hands, you are too stupid to not make a mess.


It's like asking, "Should we invade Afghanistan?" and 91% of people saying yes. It's besides the point-- because we're already in fuckign Afghanistan anyway

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The part in bold isn't even close to being attempted so stop getting your panties in a bunch over crap you are making up. Background checks do not make anything illegal.

Even if they did 'ban' military style assault weapons that would not make semi-automatic weapons illegal, only certain envisioned/designed/tested to kill humans during every step of their creation assault weapons.

For someone who is presenting themselves as pro-gun you really know little about weaponry.

The "military style assault" is a misnomer of liberal media proportions. Most hunting rifles have the same characteristics and are even chambered in larger rounds, yet because they don't look scary get a pass. Also I'm pretty sure all guns are designed to kill, it's kind of the point.

[Hitchens]

Originally Posted by Black Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

BEEP BOOP HOW DO I HUMAN

[Stinkum]

Originally Posted by Black Jesus

Yea the people agree with background checks. GOOD THING WE ALREADY HAVE THEM HUH.

Background checks are currently required in sales made by federally licensed gun dealers, but not for gun sales by private sellers.

The questions are asking if people would support requiring criminal background checks for ALL gun sales.

Around 90% of people in every poll said yes.

[Black Jesus]

You can only do like 2 sales in your life before needing an FFL. It's literally like .00001% of gun sales, and has background checks via required escrow of FFL in like every state but Utah. 10th amendment issue really.

The "gun show loophole" is one of the biggest myths the liberal media has dreamt up. In 99% of the undercover news video cases, state and/or federal laws are actually being broken: proving that laws DONT WORK

[Black Jesus]

How effective are background checks anyway?

Originally Posted by http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/nics

More than 100 million such checks have been made in the last decade, leading to more than 700,000 denials.

They stopped 0.007% of people from buying a gun. Goog job.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Black Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The "gun show loophole" is one of the biggest myths the liberal media has dreamt up. In 99% of the undercover news video cases, state and/or federal laws are actually being broken: proving that laws DONT WORK

Even faux news disagrees with you on this point. Please stop posting.

Originally Posted by Black Jesus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How effective are background checks anyway?



They stopped 0.007% of people from buying a gun. Goog job.

At least learn to math before posting... .7% thank you.

[Naked]

lol @ angry liberals