TMO resort to hacking in VP

[BigSlip]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am curious, to what extent do you feel my analysis has been impacted? I have clearly called for a similar regime to what Elethia put forward regarding the strictness with which exemptions are handed out. A number of people here have called for Aiaus to be banned. I am not certain the situation warrants such an extreme measure, especially in light of a demonstrable history of similar instances on the server. Should such abusers lose their exemption? Absolutely. Should we impose harsher measures? Again, of that I am unsure.

If you take issue with such a stance, I would be curious to know your exact complaint.

u are one annoying cunt. Stop abusing ip exemptions.

[kenzar]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please show me where Zereh said that one person with one account asked for an ip exemption for the purposes of plugging.

Please show me where I said that one person with one account asked for an ip exemption for the purposes of plugging.

[RipinpeaceTMO2013]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A number of people here have called for Aiaus to be banned. I am not certain the situation warrants such an extreme measure

lol tmo cheating fucks. FE has been in what VP like 1 week already caught you dudes using exploits to win.

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by BigSlip [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

u are one annoying cunt. Stop abusing ip exemptions.

I don't understand how you can spend so much time on the blue forms yet remain functionally illiterate.

[maverixdamighty]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am curious, to what extent do you feel my analysis has been impacted? I have clearly called for a similar regime to what Elethia put forward regarding the strictness with which exemptions are handed out. A number of people here have called for Aiaus to be banned. I am not certain the situation warrants such an extreme measure, especially in light of a demonstrable history of similar instances on the server. Should such abusers lose their exemption? Absolutely. Should we impose harsher measures? Again, of that I am unsure.

If you take issue with such a stance, I would be curious to know your exact complaint.

Ya this part, "Should the uses be allowed in the future? In my opinion, no. However, should we be out for blood for those who have used them in the past? Of that, I am unsure."

So basically since aiaus did it in the past we should ignore it but if it happens again it shouldn't be allowed. How convenient after he was the sole reason we were not able to kill your entire train team due to his obvious exploiting. That is why you are biased and should quit posting.

[finalgrunt]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am curious, to what extent do you feel my analysis has been impacted? I have clearly called for a similar regime to what Elethia put forward regarding the strictness with which exemptions are handed out. A number of people here have called for Aiaus to be banned. I am not certain the situation warrants such an extreme measure, especially in light of a demonstrable history of similar instances on the server. Should such abusers lose their exemption? Absolutely. Should we impose harsher measures? Again, of that I am unsure.

If you take issue with such a stance, I would be curious to know your exact complaint.

Tell me if I'm wrong here:

The person on the video is exploiting (yes, dropping aggro instantly is an exploit).
It can't be done without an IP exemption.
Therefore the person on the video is exploiting IP exemption.
Dual boxing is also exploiting IP exemption. It is said: "Those caught will most likely be subject to a permanent ban (GM/Guide discretion)."

There is no debate here. What is wierd though, it the support coming from your guild. Which could bring you more trouble than anything. Why would you do it? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[BigLe2e]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am curious, to what extent do you feel my analysis has been impacted? I have clearly called for a similar regime to what Elethia put forward regarding the strictness with which exemptions are handed out. A number of people here have called for Aiaus to be banned. I am not certain the situation warrants such an extreme measure, especially in light of a demonstrable history of similar instances on the server. Should such abusers lose their exemption? Absolutely. Should we impose harsher measures? Again, of that I am unsure.

If you take issue with such a stance, I would be curious to know your exact complaint.

This guys posts remind me of that one episode of seinfeld where George teaches Putty his "move" since Jerrry denied him the usage of his own move and Elaine described it as a bunch of fluff with no finish.

Most uninteresting, biased but doesnt think hes biased poster in RNF!

[Ele]

Originally Posted by kenzar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please show me where I said that one person with one account asked for an ip exemption for the purposes of plugging.

That is your whole argument.

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ya this part, "Should the uses be allowed in the future? In my opinion, no. However, should we be out for blood for those who have used them in the past? Of that, I am unsure."

So basically since aiaus did it in the past we should ignore it but if it happens again it shouldn't be allowed. How convenient after he was the sole reason we were not able to kill your entire train team due to his obvious exploiting. That is why you are biased and should quit posting.

As I elaborated, the comment out for blood wass specifically meant to address the idea that he should be banned. I am simply unsure that such a measure would be consistent with the current precedence regarding punishment in such issues. Again, should such abuse want the stripping of an exemption? Absolutely. Are additional measures such as bans necessary? Again, I am unsure.

It is not that Aiaus' actions should be excused because he did in the past, it is because a ban in this scenario does not seem consistent with how such abuses have been handled in the past. For example, Giegue cited that exemptions have been stripped on red for such conduct. Thus, removal of an exemption here would seem consistent. To elevate the punishment would be a measure that I am unsure is necessary or fair.

[Tanthallas]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thus, removal of an exemption here would seem consistent. To elevate the punishment would be a measure that I am unsure is necessary or fair.

lol.