TMO resort to hacking in VP

[Ele]

Originally Posted by BigSlip [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this old man is annoying

youre on an emulated everquest forum

lets act like a lawyer / priest

derp

As opposed to let's all troll each other all day long accomplishing nothing?

Step out of the cave and better yourself son.

[BigSlip]

Originally Posted by RipinpeaceTMO2013 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

only post slippery ever made worth a damn

***** who u iz anyway

[maverixdamighty]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Visceral and Getsome,

Please get off your high horses. If you want my personal opinion you need only ask: I submit that the use of exemptions for ALL non-essential (read: so 2 people can play) uses should be disallowed and coded so as to be stymied a much as possible. I asked my questions as an academic point, and because I suspect that much of this outrage is manufactured especially in light of the fact that many of these supposedly culpable uses are widespread and have a very seriously developed history of used by many parties.

Should the uses be allowed in the future? In my opinion, no. However, should we be out for blood for those who have used them in the past? Of that, I am unsure.

if it was FE doing it to TMO you would be quite sure.

[BigSlip]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As opposed to let's all troll each other all day long accomplishing nothing?

Step out of the cave and better yourself son.

negus look here



im at work for another 30 minutes, ima troll u blubs bitching about blub drama if i see fit


holla

[Ele]

Originally Posted by kenzar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Im not equating anything. Im merely saying: "The scenario outlined by Zereh does not merit an exemption (1players/2clients.) If anyone is using an exemption like this then it should be taken away. Exemptions are for multiple people playing from the same singular connection. My statement does not go any further than addressing the initial exemption request. Dont put words in my mouth, read/comprehend harder; it's almost as if you two are playing dumb on purpose. Was it that hard to comprehend all this from my original statement? Did it require me to repeat my words in 3 separate ways before you understood?

Zereh did not posit any position on how the exemption was acquired, but the use. You injected that the current use was the reason for why the exemption was obtained.

You sir need to step back and reexamine your initial and continuing argument.

If you wish to discuss the merits of does one person with one account deserve an ip exemption, then the answer to that question is no.

[falkun]

So basically Giegue's post sums it up: Aiaus' IP exemption should be gone. Additional punishments, while warranted by global rules (this is VP after-all), are discretionary. The good news is, FE shouldn't have to put up with Aiaus doing this again, on to the next IP-exempt cleric that attempts this!

[falkun]

O, and put in your IP exemption tonight, because its "questionably legal" at this point. So you're in the clear until you get caught doing it.

[RipinpeaceTMO2013]

MECCZAN

WRU

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

if it was FE doing it to TMO you would be quite sure.

It is my sincere hope that I have demonstrated with my actions and contributions that when I make a statement I mean it. No, if the situation were reversed I would not feel otherwise.

[kenzar]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Zereh did not posit any position on how the exemption was acquired, but the use. You injected that the current use was the reason for why the exemption was obtained.

You sir need to step back and reexamine your initial and continuing argument.

If you wish to discuss the merits of does one person with one account deserve an ip exemption, then the answer to that question is no.

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Zereh did not posit any position on how the exemption was acquired, but the use.

/facepalm.

Originally Posted by Zereh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

IT doesn't require two accounts, it just requires two computers and one account with an IP exemption. Play EQ on PC1, have PC2 locked and loaded @ character select ~ /q out on PC1 and hit enter on PC2.

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

does one person with one account deserve an ip exemption, then the answer to that question is no.

How many more times do u need it spelled out for you before you understand? Please just quantify it for me so I can know if this is a exercise in futility or not.