03-21-2013, 10:47 AM
|
|
Sarnak
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 347
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AenarieFenninRo
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So, there seem to be two arguments going on here, one that seems to offset the other... and being made by the same people, which is a joke to me.
Theory one, that he didn't DA so he had agro which shouldn't allow for fast switching
Theory two, that /q is an exploit that shouldn't be allowed (fast switching).
to address the first from your fraps, its hard to tell if he does DA or not, but you do realize that being at character select or having your account active on a different character does allow DA to reset right? So with a cleric having 2 DAs, possibly an idol... thats at least 3 DAs available to them which would then make this "ok" because the person didn't have agro based on being DA.
The second, has been known for a LONG time so to start sounding indignant about someone /q'ing for a fast switch just makes you sound like whiney children.
I dont see how this argument can stand up in court. Hell, even Chest is here defending it, and he's nearly ALWAYS against TMO in R&F. If that doesn't tell you something, then you're not paying attention much.
|
He a young lawyer. Maybe to young better call in the guns to spin this evidence
__________________
Kagok Bonemender 60 Shaman
Warok Bonebreaker 60 Warrior
Team Tripod
I'd rather be fishing
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
