Drama

[Skope]

He zones in lguk and expects to keep the camp.

What? Learn to play your character, shortcuts can sometimes get you into trouble. This is one of those times.

[Agaron]

Originally Posted by Stickyfingers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Enchanter needs to suck less and l2notzone IMO. This wouldn't happen if he/she/it did. Also, who gives a fuck about agreements, follow the rules and don't make up your own.

You're in Transcendence. You're joking right?

[Stickyfingers]

Originally Posted by Agaron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're in Transcendence. You're joking right?

Is that supposed to be some sleight against me? I'm sorry, aren't you like a guildless level 43 Paladin anyways? I have sat with Enchanters before watching them take King, Lord, you name it, solo. I know for a fact you DO NOT need to zone/camp in order to take those camps, it definitely helps don't get me wrong, not necessary though.

[PhelanKA]

PVP would solve all of this.

[Combo]

Originally Posted by Shewz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, I just want to write this little story down.

So:

1.) They cleared the camp and left it.
2.) You showed up to camp it.
3.) They come back and say it was their camp.
4.) You say they weren't there and thus it's yours, but you'll give it back after one spawn.
5.) They agree and give you your spawn.
6.) You are unable to kill the King and leave the camp.
7.) They return to see an uncamped King and kill it.

There's a double standard here. It's OK for YOU to take a camp if no one is there, but it's not OK for THEM to take the camp if no one is there.

It's irrelevant that you're an Enchanter and (felt like you) needed to zone to complete the encounter. You abandoned the camp. Indeed, you actually left the zone.

[Combo]

Oh, forgot the last step:

8.) You come on the forums to bitch and do so, even though if it had just been another placeholder and the events transpired as they did, you wouldn't have cared a single bit.

[2pair]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Dantes]

This thread still going?

In my opinion, my cat's breath smells like cat food.

[Agaron]

Originally Posted by Combo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So:

1.) They cleared the camp and left it.
2.) You showed up to camp it.
3.) They come back and say it was their camp.
4.) You say they weren't there and thus it's yours, but you'll give it back after one spawn.
5.) They agree and give you your spawn.
6.) You are unable to kill the King and leave the camp.
7.) They return to see an uncamped King and kill it.

There's a double standard here. It's OK for YOU to take a camp if no one is there, but it's not OK for THEM to take the camp if no one is there.

It's irrelevant that you're an Enchanter and (felt like you) needed to zone to complete the encounter. You abandoned the camp. Indeed, you actually left the zone.

Did you even read the thread?

[Stepy]

"First group wiped, during which time they took WAY too long to regroup, enough time for Enchanter to clear the camp, with no one bothering to run down there to hold the camp while others were rezzed and such."

So what is enough time to regroup and get back to a camp to reclaim it? This is not live where you use throne AA, grab some plat fromm banker in lobby and grab a summoning stone and hit PoK to portal back to swamp and get back into Guk. Not everyone has what is necessary to get back down safely and hold the camp, ivis and ivu potions are not sold on every street corner. Even if someone was at zone waiting for others and they don't see a cc how are they to know a chanter will stroll in and take the camp. I guess you think every time you find a group spot you immediately bind close in case of wipe then all run down together needing ivis and ivu along the way for all.