First Aggro + 15

[Leokaiser]

Originally Posted by astarothel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If no rule can solve the problem, let's just limit the problem (via rules) until such time that no rule is needed? Gonna have to say that's not exactly a bulletproof argument. All that means is that there will need to be compromise, not that "first to engage" is inherently superior to any other system proposed.

I think the amount of debate going on and the vast differences in opinion expressed indicates there is no 'bulletproof argument'. Some people want strictly moderated rotations, others FFA with no rules beyond that. I entirely agree that this is a matter people will have to compromise on, and I imagine the matter will be (or perhaps should be) decided by which manner of compromise is the most reasonable and/or has the most popular support and provides the least amount of work for GMs.

As said, views on the subject vary, but as for me...

Originally Posted by Leokaiser [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm of the opinion that this is a good compromise.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]