stop bringing up the founding fathers in gun arguments

[Ahldagor]

thank you hitchens. once again you win. /bow

[patriot1776]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your data didn't actually show that.

So basically, you are completely lost, you have no point, and you are mad?

Your data wasn't representative of anything you were trying to prove. There was 0 correlation.

Good job you succeeded in demonstrating to the educated here that you are clueless. I am sure patriot and hatelores will eat up your pretty graphs though. Good company you keep haha.

actually he shut your case that gun ban would reduce crime down completely. thanks for playin

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by vaylorie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So I take it this is your way of saying that I was right and you were wrong? How embarrassing for you. Good luck in your future endeavors, i wish you well.

Apparently, reading comprehension isn't your thing as well. Nothing you have said is backed up with evidence. None of the "evidence" you presented supported your arguments. So yes you win at being clueless, moronic, and delusional. Good job?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by patriot1776 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

actually he shut your case that gun ban would reduce crime down completely. thanks for playin

I never said anything about guns being the cause of all crime. Apparently, ignorance loves company too.

[vaylorie]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yes you win

Way to handle it like a gentleman. Bravo sir.

[Hitchens]

@vaylorie,

One should not misrepresent statistics just to make a philosophical point. I'm quite sure it isn't intentional, but that is what is going on here.

[vaylorie]

Originally Posted by Hitchens [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

@vaylorie,

One should not misrepresent statistics just to make a philosophical point. I'm quite sure it isn't intentional, but that is what is going on here.

Instead of leaning on your philosophical point, please better evaluate the data or show any proof that gun controls do reduce violent crime. I'm made a fairly clear and evidence-based case whereas through 25 pages there has been absolutely no proof that gun controls reduce violent crime. There have, of course, been a tremendous number of juvenile opinions based on emotion, ignorance, and whatever you heard Chris Matthews or Piers Morgan say. If you want to be taken seriously, why don't you make a case, present some details, or move along to troll another day.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by vaylorie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Instead of leaning on your philosophical point, please better evaluate the data or show any proof that gun controls do reduce violent crime. I'm made a fairly clear and evidence-based case whereas through 25 pages there has been absolutely no proof that gun controls reduce violent crime. There have, of course, been a tremendous number of juvenile opinions based on emotion, ignorance, and whatever you heard Chris Matthews or Piers Morgan say. If you want to be taken seriously, why don't you make a case, present some details, or move along to troll another day.

You are deluded by your prejudice

Your intelligence is compromised by your emotion.

You are more worried about winning an argument then you are in being correct in your information.

Bad boy!

[patriot1776]

crime skyrockets in australia, DC, and britain when they took the guns

"show statistics"

statistics shown

"ur deluded"

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by patriot1776 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

crime skyrockets in australia, DC, and britain when they took the guns

"show statistics"

statistics shown

"ur deluded"

Except those weren't stats that demonstrated a point. I could link nonrelates stats about the nfl here too