Quote:
Originally Posted by Fountree
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually, on any sane comparison to the timeline of live, you're dead wrong Falk and u know it. Between 1999-2001 we were well into velious already (2 years, same amount of time Kunark has been released for with pretty much nothing else). So I can't take anything you say seriously... You've had plenty of time to play in Kunark (and will continue to for the rest of the server's history)
|
I know when the expansions were released. You know that TMO overgears Kunark and will likely overgear Velious due to being near-100% BiS. You also have a larger raid force than was classic and many more accounts per player than was classic. All of these facts are true (both mine and yours), but I still have things to do in Kunark. That is because I'm
not trying to DOMINATE Kunark and other guilds, but I'm trying to
have fun in Everquest. I argue that makes me, and those like me that still wish to experience Kunark content, less
desperate than those like you who still artificially deny Kunark content while whining about Kunark content being old and demanding new content in Velious. You are burning both ends of the candle and then whining that you've used up the entire candle. Sorry, you don't get a new one, Fountree.
Fountree, do you realize that within a single post you have simultaneously complained that "VP is old" while also argued that training should remain within VP?
01-09-2013, 01:07 PM
Threaded Mode