Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 11-12-2012, 07:54 PM
Tanthallas Tanthallas is offline
Fire Giant

Tanthallas's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eccezan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I agree with this and would like to the following diagram to prove my point:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You guys keep getting the hair wrong.
  #142  
Old 11-12-2012, 07:55 PM
hatelore hatelore is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texico
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Derp, so we engage a mob take the first dt and you honestly think Scorchin thought he had a chance to pull it? The wool is over your eyes friend. There is nothing honest about this pull. It was clearly an FTE snipe attempt there was 0 chance of a pull.
Hey momo, go back to the corner haha. I am not taking sides, I was just answering her question from my understanding of the game mechanics... Not taking any side here

And read my previous posts, did I not say in a different way that , fte then bravehearting the mob with 2-3-4-5-6-7 however many if it isn't enough to kill ct, is gay???

You find arguments where they don't even exist, you never cease to amaze me.
  #143  
Old 11-12-2012, 07:57 PM
Tanthallas Tanthallas is offline
Fire Giant

Tanthallas's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Derp, so we engage a mob take the first dt and you honestly think Scorchin thought he had a chance to pull it? The wool is over your eyes friend. There is nothing honest about this pull. It was clearly an FTE snipe attempt there was 0 chance of a pull.
Once again for all mentally challenged people like Alarti.

You took the zonewide DT, which does not constitute being put on the agro list. Hence you were not on the agro list.

Scorchin took the DT from CT which is a result of being on the agro list. TMO engaged inbetween Scorchin being on the agro list and Scorchin dieing.

Hence, FTE SHOUT would have called SCORCHIN. Hence FTE would have been SCORCHIN'S if you engaged before he was off the agro list.

Go back to school.
  #144  
Old 11-12-2012, 07:59 PM
Eccezan Eccezan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanthallas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Once again for all mentally challenged people like Alarti.

You took the zonewide DT, which does not constitute being put on the agro list. Hence you were not on the agro list.

Scorchin took the DT from CT which is a result of being on the agro list. TMO engaged inbetween Scorchin being on the agro list and Scorchin dieing.

Hence, FTE SHOUT would have called SCORCHIN. Hence FTE would have been SCORCHIN'S if you engaged before he was off the agro list.

Go back to school.
Oh how foolish are we to designate DT'ers to take the first two DT's, and how lucky are we that the first person to aggro him is always lucky enough to take the "ZONEWIDE" DT.
  #145  
Old 11-12-2012, 07:59 PM
MooseTX82 MooseTX82 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Versus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What a bunch of nonsense. I literally can't believe you're trying to convince people this was anything more than a FTE snipe.
pretty much
__________________
  #146  
Old 11-12-2012, 08:00 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanthallas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Once again for all mentally challenged people like Alarti.

You took the zonewide DT, which does not constitute being put on the agro list. Hence you were not on the agro list.

Scorchin took the DT from CT which is a result of being on the agro list. TMO engaged inbetween Scorchin being on the agro list and Scorchin dieing.

Hence, FTE SHOUT would have called SCORCHIN. Hence FTE would have been SCORCHIN'S if you engaged before he was off the agro list.

Go back to school.
And then when he died he would have reset?

You took EQ rule lawyering in school? I never saw that course offering.
How do you put that on your resume'?
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #147  
Old 11-12-2012, 08:01 PM
Ele Ele is offline
Planar Protector

Ele's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,290
Default

[Mon Nov 12 10:05:21 2012] Cazic Thule says 'DRUI'
[Mon Nov 12 10:05:24 2012] Taelara says, 'Hail, Cazic Thule'
[Mon Nov 12 10:05:26 2012] Cazic Thule shouts 'Denizens of Fear, your master commands you to come forth to his aid!!
[Mon Nov 12 10:05:29 2012] Kaltion tries to pierce Cazic Thule, but misses!
[Mon Nov 12 10:05:29 2012] Cazic Thule shouts 'SCORCHIN'
[Mon Nov 12 10:05:30 2012] Cazic Thule crushes Kaltion for 381 points of damage.
[Mon Nov 12 10:05:30 2012] Cazic Thule tries to crush Kaltion, but misses!
[Mon Nov 12 10:05:30 2012] Cazic Thule bashes Kaltion for 230 points of damage.
[Mon Nov 12 10:05:31 2012] Biggslick tries to slash Cazic Thule pet, but Cazic Thule pet's magical skin absorbs the blow!


[Mon Nov 12 10:06:00 2012] Your faction standing with DenizensofFear could not possibly get any worse.
[Mon Nov 12 10:06:00 2012] Your faction standing with CazicThule could not possibly get any worse.


[Mon Nov 12 10:07:49 2012] Ephi says out of character, 'FTE -> Scorchin, Kaltion, Biggslick'
  #148  
Old 11-12-2012, 08:01 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ephi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The ruling was fair.

It's our job as staff to make the best ruling based on our judgement of the situation, and the facts at hand. I was watching the engage. TMO did not "interfere" with a pull, because the entire raid force was running toward CT. In fact, Drui of TMO took a DT before Scorchin did, and the rest of the force was right behind him.


TMOs entire raid force was under CT when Scorchin was DTd. No other FE were anywhere near him. The encounter logs support that statement.

Like I said, the FTE rules are there to provide the best level playing ground for the server and all guilds who want to participate. These are not hard and fast, 100% FTE always wins rules. It certainly wins when there are no other facts at the table. But saying FTE is the only thing that matters is like saying you can tag FTE while simultaneously training the other raid... there would be other facts there that inform the decision.

.
For tanth since he seems incapable of reasoned thought. Rageon!
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #149  
Old 11-12-2012, 08:03 PM
Loke Loke is offline
Fire Giant

Loke's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: AKANON PROBABLY
Posts: 781
Default

ITT a bunch of TMO people agree with each other and call other people names. Nice to see so much has changed since the IB days.
  #150  
Old 11-12-2012, 08:04 PM
Eccezan Eccezan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ITT a bunch of TMO people agree with each other and call other people names. Nice to see so much has changed since the IB days.
cheater cheater pumpkin eater
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.