Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:02 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yea you said that before, and in classic alarti fashion I couldn't tell if you were trolling or just that fucking retarded. Apparently its the latter. Clearly he was hit by the zonewide random dt since my name was first on the encounter log. Otherwise it he would have been on the aggro list.
Man you are easy. TROLLOLOLOL

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #62  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:07 PM
Ephi Ephi is offline
VIP / Contributor

Ephi's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Rivervale
Posts: 2,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
VS was an entirely different situation. Nothing about that applies here.

In this situation we had a raid force, I got FTE, then TMO Jumped on the mob and killed it. When can you say FTE snipe is any different than initiating a pull and what they did is any different from them KSing it? FTE is supposed to take all of the GM discretion out of a given situation, make it so it is not a call based on favoritism but one of hard evidence. Every other time the FTE situation has come up its "soandso got fte, congrats guild of soandso!" but this time we are all about "the Spirit of FTE" whatever the fuck that is.

And yea, you and every GM in history is an unbiased bastion of blind justice. Never heard that before either.

I don't care about the mob, or the loot which was shitty as i understand it... What i care about is the idea that the precedents and rules of the server can be whimsically overturned by a new GM that can clearly be influenced by cryspam of TMO.
Yes, you're right, it's a different situation, although the ruling was based on similar grounds.

And for the record, I received zero tells from any members of TMO before making the ruling. Nor was I watching OOC/Shout. I also helped rule for you guys on the VS kill.

If you think I favor TMO, take it up with Rogean please.
  #63  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:10 PM
Happyfeet Happyfeet is offline
Sarnak

Happyfeet's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 447
Default

I think you favor halflings. COME AT ME, TRY TO REFUTE THAT!
__________________
-Happyfeets/Crappyfeet/Crackyfeet/Abraham, TMO
The Plague of Fennin Ro
  #64  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:11 PM
Ephi Ephi is offline
VIP / Contributor

Ephi's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Rivervale
Posts: 2,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happyfeet [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think you favor halflings. COME AT ME, TRY TO REFUTE THAT!
This I cannot deny.

Stepping out of this thread for good now. Take care guys.
  #65  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:11 PM
Eccezan Eccezan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatelore [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
But enough of the de-rail... So the new rule is, have fte and be sure to run your 4 or 5 men to the mob and braveheart it? Clarification humbly requested .
How bout.............do what it takes to make a legitimate CT engage?

Legitimate = CC fear adds and engage with the amount of people necessary to actually kill him?

Not sure what there is to argue about when there was a GM WATCHING your bullshit during the raid. In another time...gm's watching what you guys did today might rule raid interference and you might be suspended for it.

Lucky for you they've gotten compassionate from the pathetic attempts your leadership calls competition.
  #66  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:12 PM
Diggles Diggles is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: FEED UPON YOUR {◕ ◡ ◕}
Posts: 1,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happyfeet [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think you favor halflings. COME AT ME, TRY TO REFUTE THAT!
Heallun is more of a halfling than anyone on this server can hope to be.

Ephi might be close.
  #67  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:14 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eccezan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not sure what there is to argue about when there was a GM WATCHING your bullshit during the raid. In another time...gm's watching what you guys did today might rule raid interference and you might be suspended for it.
I'm so glad those 2 are gone!
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #68  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:22 PM
hatelore hatelore is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texico
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ephi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This I cannot deny.

Stepping out of this thread for good now. Take care guys.
still waiting on the dark elf illusion!!@$%
  #69  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:27 PM
Tarathiel Tarathiel is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: northern cali
Posts: 640
Default

this all sounds like soooo much fun
  #70  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:33 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ephi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes, you're right, it's a different situation, although the ruling was based on similar grounds.

And for the record, I received zero tells from any members of TMO before making the ruling. Nor was I watching OOC/Shout. I also helped rule for you guys on the VS kill.

If you think I favor TMO, take it up with Rogean please.
The question is whether its better to have simple, well-defined rules which are sometimes unfair or to have flexible, more ambiguous rules that attempt to cover more situations correctly. It seems that FE was basically trying to exploit the FTE rules, this offended you, and so you awarded the loot to TMO. I agree that one guild charging a raid mob with another guy sneaking in and trying to FTE snipe is silly. But when you break your own rules you lose credibility.

What this should tell you is that you need to fix the system. There are lots of ways, for example: after a person from guild x gets FTE, the mob enters in to a 'guild seek and destroy mode' where players from other guilds cannot damage the mob or enter its hate list for ~20 seconds. This gives the non-FTE guild time to back off and let the sniper wipe. Or you could ditch FTE and add up damage by guild.

The point is you need something consistent without too much potential for exploitation.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.