Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 09-02-2012, 02:43 PM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

Hey just because we're not handing Sev engages to BDA and Divinity (guilds that have killed him) doesn't mean we wouldn't for someone like Full Circle or whoever. Recently at a draco we saw Full Circle was in a clear PoF and instead of sending our bards to go tag the thing, we gave them 5 or 10 minutes to get an attempt. I'm not promising anyone anything, but if you're some guild that hasn't killed one of these lower priority targets before, I think most people would be behind giving you an attempt. When you demonstrate that you can kill it, though, is when we cease with the leeway. I think that's fair enough.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #102  
Old 09-02-2012, 03:01 PM
Knightt Knightt is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 263
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hey just because we're not handing Sev engages to BDA and Divinity (guilds that have killed him) doesn't mean we wouldn't for someone like Full Circle or whoever. Recently at a draco we saw Full Circle was in a clear PoF and instead of sending our bards to go tag the thing, we gave them 5 or 10 minutes to get an attempt. I'm not promising anyone anything, but if you're some guild that hasn't killed one of these lower priority targets before, I think most people would be behind giving you an attempt. When you demonstrate that you can kill it, though, is when we cease with the leeway. I think that's fair enough.

i dont see anything wrong with this at all hopefully we get that 5 or 10 min window from you guys one day
  #103  
Old 09-02-2012, 03:07 PM
canker canker is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 405
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Itap [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So what I've gathered from this thread is, from TMO members' point of view, if you have a full time job, kids, wife, family, ect., you will not really have a chance to experience the end game. Shouldn't everyone have a chance to experience it, no matter how casual/hardcore?

I can dedicate a fair share of time to EQ on certain days, but theres no way in hell i can log on in the middle of the day to kill a raid mob.

Don't take this question the wrong way, this isn't a sob story, just a legitimate question
I hate this argument. most TMO members have full time jobs or significant others/families to care about, just like everyone else. we do have some members that have slightly less responsibilities than the rest, but it's a large minority compared to the guild as a whole.

where we are different from most casual players/non-raiders is that we're able to balance our time in real life and in everquest to create a healthy compromise between the two. it's not a particularly easy thing to do, and some people just can't figure it out even with time. but to say that just because you or others have real life responsibilities that prevent people from experiencing end game content is just a weak and flimsy excuse. everyone does. it's about achieving balance between the things in your life.

as others have said, we also have players from all over the world. our majority are north american or european time based players, but we have players with different schedules and playtimes to ensure our guilds presence at all times of the day.
  #104  
Old 09-02-2012, 03:09 PM
Sirken Sirken is offline
VIP / Contributor

Sirken's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,822
Default

rotations are stupid.

i will not support, suggest, or enforce rotations.
  #105  
Old 09-02-2012, 03:13 PM
Llabak Llabak is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 73
Default

Awesome feedback! thanks Sirken!
__________________
- Berty, Necro of BDA
The original gnomeosexual
  #106  
Old 09-02-2012, 03:20 PM
Tarathiel Tarathiel is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: northern cali
Posts: 640
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
rotations are stupid.

i will not support, suggest, or enforce rotations.
and having 100 people sit on a spawn point to have FTE decided randomly, or even worse a group of 5-7 people sniping FTE from a legitimate raid force is better? not flaming or questioning any previous rulings, i just think there has to be a better way to do things, what the op and others have suggested would require very little GM involvement if the players were respectful to one another. of course there would still be instances of douchebaggery but i think they would dramatically decrease. and fwiw a rotation does not have to be suggested, supported, or enforced by gms, they werent on Live and yet many servers had them.
  #107  
Old 09-02-2012, 03:21 PM
Knightt Knightt is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 263
Default

dont think anyone had this problem on live so you cant say that
  #108  
Old 09-02-2012, 03:28 PM
toyodafenninro toyodafenninro is offline
Orc

toyodafenninro's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarathiel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
...and fwiw a rotation does not have to be suggested, supported, or enforced by gms, they werent on Live and yet many servers had them.
Many servers did have them. Like mentioned before, on some of those servers a guild or group would need to post on a forum and be placed into a line, sometimes weeks or months behind others, to get a shot at a raid target. You might think this won't happen on p1999, but it's important to realize the system contributed to the wait time in that as soon as people realized they'd get a guaranteed shot at a mob, they would form many tiny guilds/friends groups instead of band together to form larger guilds. I don't think anyone wants to see p1999 go that direction.

Secondly, everyone on those Live Rotation servers will remember that it only takes 1 raid guild to ignore the rotation for the entire system to crash and burn. It is a 100% compliance or nothing system. Our GM's have stated they will not endorse or enforce rotations. TMO has no interest in a rotation, and I promise you if TMO didn't exist, there would be at least one guild/force/group on the server who would also prefer to fight for spawns rather than stand in the breadline.

As Jeremy said, we've given lots of shots to those who show some moxie.
__________________
Toyoda, TMO Wizard
I heard on the forums we're assholes...
  #109  
Old 09-02-2012, 03:32 PM
Sirken Sirken is offline
VIP / Contributor

Sirken's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,822
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarathiel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
and fwiw a rotation does not have to be suggested, supported, or enforced by gms, they werent on Live and yet many servers had them.
thats 100% correct. players are more than welcome to set up any kind of arrangements that they want. and as long as both(all) guilds respect it, it will work fine.


but as i said, i will not suggest, support, or enforce it from my end.
  #110  
Old 09-02-2012, 03:37 PM
kbnexus kbnexus is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 151
Default

i suggest velious, i would also support it ! could you enforce it?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.