Alternate Advancement: Good or Bad?

[rockhopper]

No one tailored their characters to specific roles using AA's. All classes had specific roles that weren't modified whatsoever by AA's. AA's merely enhanced those roles.

- Tanks prioritized tanking AA's
- Rogues prioritized DPS

Etc.

Just look at any class forum/site. Most had priority lists for AA, and whenever new people asked for AA advice, the same answers were always given.

[YendorLootmonkey]

Originally Posted by rockhopper [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one tailored their characters to specific roles using AA's. All classes had specific roles that weren't modified whatsoever by AA's. AA's merely enhanced those roles.

Pretty sure all rangers tailored their characters to the "long-distance damage dealer" role with EQ/AM3, a role they really didn't have before AAs (unless you count 2 mins of Trueshot disc every 72 mins.) Do tons more damage than I could with melee without aggro or having to be in AoE range? Yes please!!