Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-12-2012, 04:18 PM
Psionide Psionide is offline
Fire Giant

Psionide's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 601
Default

Shadius you should know better than to expect anything different. Obama's whole re-election campaign follows the same strategy. The Dems can't talk about what they've done and why they should be re-elected they just resort to blatant lies, smear and slander. Lol they haven't passed a budget in over 3 YEARS which is there primary legislating job. ANYBODY ELSE 2012!!!
  #22  
Old 08-12-2012, 05:36 PM
Hollywood Hollywood is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Obama wins, to quote "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." Romney just chose Ryan, so this election will prove if women are truly dumb and subjugated or not. If you believe in equal pay for a woman (which I do) doing the same exact fucking job you are doing, you would vote Obama. (not that I agree on him being president, i think Mark Warner of Va, the epitome of "CENTER," should have been appointed the job years ago: He declined). If you would like a return to the "good ol' days" of women in the kitchen/household/pregnant you would vote Romney. If you disagree with my statement, why have Republican dominated legislatures voted down/removed "equal pay" laws? Just curious as to what the defense is for women getting paid less than men. I just don't get it.
-Rainmon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In the midst of the back and forth between the two pundits, O’Donnell brought up a quote Coulter gave to The Guardian in 2003 in which she said that women were one group she believed should have their right to vote taken away. When pressed by O’Donnell, Coulter stood by her comments, arguing that every election since 1950, aside from the 1964 Barry Goldwater election, would have been won by Republicans had it not been for the woman vote. Using her typical logic, Coulter said this presents enough reason to disenfranchise women.
/end thread
Bitter unnecessarily much?

Look women get allll the benefits these days simply for being women. Maternity leave? Let's not even go there..

And Coulter is right. THe majority of women don't even vote, and the ones that do are - to put it mildly - flaming femi nazis still hell bent on molding the world to their selfish needy image, or simply run of the mill idiotic women ; which we have a lot of these days.

'Feminism' ruined everything. It's been fifty years of immoral and corrupt women abusing men for being immoral and corrupt. The irony is shocking and the results are worse.
Where are all those women that were going to 'heal the world,' because we gave them more 'freedoms'.

They never existed. It was all a ploy to give special privileges to self righteous twats who thought the world owed them more because they couldn't get on normally with society like everyone else. They couldn't cope, so everyone had to adjust to them.


Anyways, you people missed your chance by not voting more Constitutionalists in like Ron Paul. At least he gives a shit about the way things are meant to be - and unlike you paranoid delusional feminists, he's not talking about dish washing women whom should never leave the kitchen.

P.S. some women like staying at home....deal with it.
  #23  
Old 08-12-2012, 08:42 PM
Psionide Psionide is offline
Fire Giant

Psionide's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 601
Default

women want equal rights until it's time to get off a sinking ship or go to the frontlines of war.....
  #24  
Old 08-12-2012, 08:54 PM
Heavydrop Heavydrop is offline
Sarnak

Heavydrop's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: The desert outside of Tucson, AZ
Posts: 289
Default

ABO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wusgcG4rfo
__________________
Scyros Windchaser - 60 Wood Elf Druid
100 in ALL languages

Kalepto Mayniak - 54 Half-Elf Rogue

Ithamar Kenobi- 57 High Elf Magician
171 research skill
  #25  
Old 08-12-2012, 09:05 PM
Orruar Orruar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Obama wins, to quote "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." Romney just chose Ryan, so this election will prove if women are truly dumb and subjugated or not. If you believe in equal pay for a woman (which I do) doing the same exact fucking job you are doing, you would vote Obama. (not that I agree on him being president, i think Mark Warner of Va, the epitome of "CENTER," should have been appointed the job years ago: He declined). If you would like a return to the "good ol' days" of women in the kitchen/household/pregnant you would vote Romney. If you disagree with my statement, why have Republican dominated legislatures voted down/removed "equal pay" laws? Just curious as to what the defense is for women getting paid less than men. I just don't get it.
-Rainmon
Equal pay for equal work sounds like a noble goal, until you understand some basic economics.

Labor is one of the largest expenses in almost any industry. If there really was a large wage gap between men and women, any good capitalist would exploit such a difference and hire only female workers. This person would be able to run their competition out of business and we would see all these giant female only corporations. We don't see that though. So either every single businessman (and businesswoman, since many companies are owned/run by women) is a sexist pig and wants to pay men more than women for the same work, or there isn't the giant wage gap that people claim.

Now, what will be the effects of Obama's equal pay for equal work law? This bill directly increases the cost to hire a woman, since the risk of a future lawsuit must now be figured in. This will lead to women either receiving less compensation, or to them not getting the job at all. Look at it from the employer's point of view. If they have 2 equally qualified applicants, one man and one woman, both of whom are demanding the exact same wage, but the woman could possibly file a lawsuit in the future based on this law, they will naturally choose the less risky hire, and take the man. So while this bill was passed with good intentions, it is going to have the exact opposite effect.

Are you really going to vote for someone who is stupid enough to promote laws that hurt certain groups like this?
  #26  
Old 08-12-2012, 09:37 PM
stonez138 stonez138 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 144
Default

I wonder if Hollywood realises just how ignorant he sounds? Please name me "alll the benefits" women get these days for being women? As far as a lack of paternity leave in this country, it has nothing to do with femenists and everything to do with our lawmakers being completely beholden to business interests and not the peoples interests. That's why the VAST MAJORITY of the free world does have paternity leave. (and under 40 hour work week paid vacation and /gasp the right to quality health care)

Do you also believe that an aspirin for betwen her knees is the only birthcontrol a woman's insurance should have to pay for?

These are the real gems though....

Quote:
It was all a ploy to give special privileges to self righteous twats who thought the world owed them more because they couldn't get on normally with society like everyone else.
I know! All those lesbians that don't want to raise a man's kids should have just been happy being teachers or nurses wtf do they think they have the right to other jobs for. And a man should still be able to slap his woman if she gets lippy!

Quote:
It's been fifty years of immoral and corrupt women abusing men for being immoral and corrupt.
You are so right! We men have been SO savagely oppressed by women since 1962! Especially white men! FIGHT THE POWER!

Orruar, I don't think your post just doesn't hold water. According to your logic, any good capitalist would only hire the handicap, since they get tax breaks and/or subsidies for hiring these people wouldn't that be the cheapest possible labor pool? I'm sure a "good" capitalist also factors in things such as, I don't know, work experience or education.
  #27  
Old 08-12-2012, 09:43 PM
stonez138 stonez138 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 144
Default

The ultimate irony though is Hollywood calling someone out for being bitter when his entire post is seething with resentment.
  #28  
Old 08-12-2012, 09:52 PM
tops419 tops419 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 116
Default

Vote for Obama
Most people will NEVER see 250K in a year, so don't worry about your taxes going up
Healthcare is impossibly expensive for normal folks.

Those voting for romney/republicans are delusional
  #29  
Old 08-12-2012, 10:20 PM
Supreme Supreme is offline
Planar Protector

Supreme's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rivervale,Texas
Posts: 1,077
Default

250k as a couple is VERY easy to accomplish.

Wealth envy seems to be a viable strategy to get elected.

Lets blame all the achievers for your failures and make THEM give you what you DESERVE!
  #30  
Old 08-12-2012, 10:20 PM
Psionide Psionide is offline
Fire Giant

Psionide's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 601
Default

Wow I'd get into a debate with you on healthcare but after that comment it seems like you don't know much about healthcare.

Bigger lolz is how Owebama is using GM as an example of his good work and bailout. Funny how he uses GM as a model for the future of our economy.

Gm made 7.6 BILLION dollars last year and didn't pay a dime in taxes to the gov. He talks about outsourcing, almost 2/3 of GMs work force is overseas. This company is sitting on 300 billion in cash and securities, instead of paying back the taxpayers or hiring American workers. Lol Owebama says GM is number 1 again HAHAHA. Gm and its finance arm Ally are two of the few companies to payback TARP loans. It's stock has fallen 38 percent since 2010 and is losing market share this year while japanese competitors are the real ones "roaring back". Chrysler who the Owebama administration let be sold to an italian company is doing better.

Oh and the govt btw for every dollar it borrows is spending 40 cents. ANYBODY ELSE 2012.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.