Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Resolved Issues

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 02-29-2012, 04:16 PM
Shiftin Shiftin is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Versus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
For the record, that was our pull. We had FTE and therefore can cast whatever spells we want on the mob. IB/VD stole it off our puller. That's why nothing was ever done about it.
You lost FTE when the only person on the aggro list was charmed. That moves a player from the aggro list because that player is friendly to the dragon. This is why you pull dragons with two people and why talndor shouted a re-engage message when our puller hit him as he saw talendor patching back home rather than following your puller.

I can prove that being charmed removes you from the aggro list based on a recent hoshkar when I get home to my PC if you like, but the logs of talendor using his specific shout only used when first aggroed out of seek mode kinda already proved this.

Saying something is established without understanding the mechanics of the server is extremely counterproductive to a discussion like this. You've also been told and chastised IB in the past for taking matters into our own hands. You are no less wrong in forcing a wipe here than you claim we were in similar instances. You cannot have it both ways.
  #42  
Old 02-29-2012, 04:17 PM
Autotune Autotune is offline
Planar Protector

Autotune's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 2,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It was done by a different guild on Talendor as shown above and was never ruled an exploit, so it is being considered fair game in a non-CSR-assist zone until ruled otherwise.

Either way, an official response would be appreciated so we know how to proceed within the scope of the server rules.
i'm so glad you said this.

Who deemed that it was considered fair game to exploit a known bug?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken
I like to ninja edit people's Sigs.
  #43  
Old 02-29-2012, 04:40 PM
Wisetree Wisetree is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fountree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We memblurred Talendor
__________________
[60 Druid] Wisetree (Halfling) <Vesica Dei>
  #44  
Old 02-29-2012, 04:45 PM
chief chief is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 256
Default

anyways....
  #45  
Old 02-29-2012, 04:46 PM
Xanthias Xanthias is offline
Sarnak

Xanthias's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Most likely my bind point
Posts: 402
Default

This is NOT Rants and Flames.
This is Bugs forum.
Take the my sword is bigger than yours talk there.

This is a bug, Rogean said as much.
Just curious when it will be fixed.

Thank you
__________________
60 Ranger and proud of it.
First Ranger Epic on P99
3rd place BotB
  #46  
Old 02-29-2012, 05:04 PM
Zeelot Zeelot is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 625
Default

We would also appreciate a GM ruling on the matter so that we know whether memblurring VP raid targets to CH them is allowed.
__________________
Zeelot <TMO>
  #47  
Old 02-29-2012, 05:18 PM
Raavak Raavak is offline
Planar Protector

Raavak's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Creepin' inta your back door.
Posts: 2,038
Default

I've looked a little for specific links proving whether memblur is a complete reset in a mobs hp or not and found nothing in that regard (because it wasn't that way at all ever as far as I can recollect). Lots of discussion on the use of it in various situations where a complete hp reset would have been a quick raid wipe (changing rampage tank in Velious). The only use for griefing was in order to win a "dps race" when one raid was trying to KS another (memblur AoW when the mob was already damaged and then disc it to death) in Velious.

Found no reference in posted patch notes archive.
Last edited by Raavak; 02-29-2012 at 05:28 PM..
  #48  
Old 02-29-2012, 05:21 PM
fishingme fishingme is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiftin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You lost FTE when the only person on the aggro list was charmed. That moves a player from the aggro list because that player is friendly to the dragon. This is why you pull dragons with two people and why talndor shouted a re-engage message when our puller hit him as he saw talendor patching back home rather than following your puller.

I can prove that being charmed removes you from the aggro list based on a recent hoshkar when I get home to my PC if you like, but the logs of talendor using his specific shout only used when first aggroed out of seek mode kinda already proved this.

Saying something is established without understanding the mechanics of the server is extremely counterproductive to a discussion like this. You've also been told and chastised IB in the past for taking matters into our own hands. You are no less wrong in forcing a wipe here than you claim we were in similar instances. You cannot have it both ways.
It doesn't matter if he was charmed and it "dropped" him from aggro table. He was still FTE, still alive, and would be attacked once charm dropped. Being charmed is still being engaged with a mob. What you're talking about is a technicality, and by what you're saying it compares to a cleric dropping a DD and then casting DI. He is still FTE but it will take a few moments for the mob to attack.
  #49  
Old 02-29-2012, 05:25 PM
Zeelot Zeelot is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 625
Default

This thread isn't a debate over that tal, but I had tagged the dragon well before the other puller got charmed. Yes charm clears aggro, but back on topic please! This is about the fact that mob CH on mem blur is not classic.
__________________
Zeelot <TMO>
  #50  
Old 02-29-2012, 05:26 PM
Autotune Autotune is offline
Planar Protector

Autotune's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 2,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishingme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It doesn't matter if he was charmed and it "dropped" him from aggro table. He was still FTE, still alive, and would be attacked once charm dropped. Being charmed is still being engaged with a mob. What you're talking about is a technicality, and by what you're saying it compares to a cleric dropping a DD and then casting DI. He is still FTE but it will take a few moments for the mob to attack.
that's actually wrong. Being charmed is technically no different than being FD'd.

All of this is beside the point tho.

A member used it once and was never ruled against.

now an entire guild (raid leaders) are using the bug exploit and defending it's use openly.

Can we please get the immunity flags or a direct ruling, or something.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken
I like to ninja edit people's Sigs.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.