![]() |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
I am sure everyone in VD is fine with a rotation.
We weren't fine with the original iteration, which was the "TMO/TMO/then the rotation actually starts" rotation: (From Coldblooded's post) [Fri Feb 17 17:12:27 2012] You told Zeelot, 'i was just talking to xeli, i dont know if your paths crossed before she logged' [Fri Feb 17 17:12:36 2012] Zeelot tells you, 'yeah he just started talking to me' [Fri Feb 17 17:12:41 2012] Zeelot tells you, 'About the epics right?' [Fri Feb 17 17:12:43 2012] You told Zeelot, 'yes' [Fri Feb 17 17:14:29 2012] You told Zeelot, 'the way it had been left with elethia, someone from each guild would get together and /random to set the rotation order' [Fri Feb 17 17:16:05 2012] Zeelot tells you, 'I told him I'd be down to put VD into a rotation, but I would like to get 2 more for tmo if possible before that starts. IB arranged an uneven agreement and I'd like to get it evened out before putting you guys in' Not speaking for Coldblooded, but I can't see how we wouldn't be fine with this rotation: (From Stealin) Quote:
So I don't see what the problem here is, aside from hashing out the "how long to engage" and "how a guild gets added to the rotation" parts. I don't think many were comfortable with this idea: Quote:
Stop trolling, Stealin... you're making yourself look stupid, as usual. You are the biggest troll on the forum, of course your credibility is ZERO. We want to see Zeelot agree to what you just rolled out before we can tell if "TMO accepted" or not. Yes, you can work out the rotation between the clerics of the involved guilds, but the disputes are going to go to the guildleaders. The enforcement of the rotation is going to go to the guildleaders. The guildleaders need to sign off on it.
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:
![]() "You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
|