![]() |
|
#21
|
||||
|
Quote:
Well, I guess there is measurable difference in warrior and knight ability to take hits, after all. I honestly didn't know that. As I mentioned above though, I doubt too many people really take that into account. More often than not, you are just happy to find ANYONE to tank in a PUG. I have yet to see even one person mention anything about wanting one class over another... one person over another based on level has come up though.
__________________
Tallenn 40 Druid
Marlock 29 Enchanter | |||
|
|
||||
|
#22
|
|||
|
I wonder if that sites info about ac applies fully on here.
I had never heard that stuff about shield AC or over the soft cap AC, as I played a monk on live. Good stuff
__________________
Girth Matters (Retired)
50 Ogre Shadow Knight Mugatoo <Center For Ants> 45 Iksar Monk "You can all go to hell, I'm going to Texas." | ||
|
|
|||
|
#23
|
|||
|
I'd like to know if AC is working as intended as well.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#24
|
|||
|
Warriors take hits better than SKs, because they tend to have higher hps and higher ac than SKs.
Warriors have higher innate magic resist. Warriors have defensive and evasive. Warriors do more damage (triple attack, higher skill caps, critical hits and crippling blows). SKs hold aggro better and have more utility. /shrug. | ||
|
Last edited by Taminy; 05-04-2010 at 08:15 PM..
|
|
||
![]() |
|
|