![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
You sound cool.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#22
|
|||
|
yeah i was 16 years old gnatte you OWT
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#23
|
||||
|
Quote:
This was the primary issue with EQOA however. Not only was it one of the very few PS2 games that required the modem attachment AND a monthly subscription, even more hardware was needed in order to play the game more comfortably (ie, the keyboard) which once again was required by virtually no other PS2 game other than this singular title. For people coming from the EQlive world the added $100+ investment might be deemed acceptable, possibly even money well spent. But for a person completely new to the Everquest universe -- or parents buying the console for their children -- such additional purchases were risky at best. At worst they were a complete waste of money because Playstation itself never really leveraged the usage of these items beyond the EQOA title. For all it's dumbed down functionality (which it had to have) and shoddy/blurry graphics, I really did like the game world itself. I thought they did a great job with what they had to work with and places like Blackburrow and Runnyeye were quite interestingly designed. It did suffer from having too linear of a quest progression, but players all having progressive class quests was (at the time) a welcome design change from what EQlive started with. At the same time however, that dumbed down functionality hindered the game tremendously. Now with today's consoles the setting is there for games of this nature to both succeed and even thrive. EQOA simply came out ahead of it's time. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#24
|
|||
|
I was on Hodstock,
Annatar, High Elf, Wizard, member of Vulgar Display of Power (VDOP), fun times, hell, I actually miss EQOA more than I do classic EQ.
__________________
ShaoPaiLong - 3 - Human - Monk (main)
Idunn - 4 - Barbarian - Shaman | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|