MLK day

[Lazortag]

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/context

[purist 3.0]

That night King retired to his room at the Willard Hotel. There FBI bugs reportedly picked up 14 hours of party chatter, the clinking of glasses and the sounds of illicit sex--including King's cries of "I'm f--ing for God" and "I'm not a Negro tonight!"

[Lazortag]

Originally Posted by Uthgaard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

An assumed implication does not mean it's the correct context. Being black, gay, female or jewish does not exempt a person from all personal criticisms. You are doing a fantastic job of making my point for me however: That the overly sensitive will attempt to redefine valid criticisms and turn them into hate speech.

No one would call those statements anything but retarded, when you swap in Bill Clinton. But they're not. They're about King, and since he was black, they must be racially motivated.

Uthgaard I know it's impossible for you to admit that you're wrong, but in this case you are being so obviously fucking retarded that even you should see why. It's not the fact that he said something bad about a black man, or even that he said something untrue about a black man (that King was a communist). It's the fact that it's Darwoth who's the one saying it that implies the racial motivation. When someone calls Africans savages, says things like this...:

Originally Posted by Darwoth

i generally do not need to say anything to make a "black man" look bad as they do it for themselves, ...

...and has a curious habit of making up lies about well-respected black people/black organizations, anyone can put two and two together and realize what the motivation behind his criticisms are. Also, keep in mind he throws around the word communist like it's punctuation - he even called me, Nelson Mandela, and Obama communists - so you can fathom that it's probably not a legitimate, well-reasoned criticism when a racist like Darwoth calls a black man a communist. He's doing it propagate his racist views. Since you're illiterate and have no idea who the fuck Darwoth is, please stop posting in this thread.

[Slathar]

darwoth is a white supremicist and supports racial segregation

[The Revanchist]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

...you're wrong...fucking retarded...black man... communist

sorry i love you geegoo

[Darwoth]

i am not afraid to be labelled an eeeeeviiiiil racist, i freely admit i dont like blacks and give no shit about who knows it, does not mean king was any less of a piece of shit and that nelson mandelas land redistribution from multi generation white farmers to blacks (who could not figure out how to properly farm the land contributing to the countrys rapid decline) is not straight out of the communist playbook.

and obama...... lol yeah he isnt a communist at all, you are a fucking moron.

[The Revanchist]

Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like to wear pants on my head because they have air vents.

[Darwoth]

and yes, black africans ARE largely little more than wild animals, hence the reason the last time we had this exchance i posted pictures and video demonstrating such where you promptly ran screaming to guinea pig in private message to have me banned.

there is a great video of life in liberia i saw a while back, one segment goes to one of the largest "towns" in the area and it consists of a bunch of corrugated tin huts constructed along a beach that is completely covered in the shit of the residents, because they would rather soil their homes and community instead of dig latrines.

even dogs do not shit all over their living quarters.

saw another good one from ghana that consisted of dozens of villagers (ever notice how the term villager is almost always a reference to africans? a combination of the fact most of africa has nothing that would resemble a town let alone a city and the chief occupation there is sitting on your ass in your village eating the contents of a UN aid package) beating 3 other villagers nearly to death before burning them alive due to the offense of witchcraft, you see the village had become convinced that these evildoers had cast evil spells that shrunk their dicks (yes, really)

aids is an epidemic there because the populace is to stupid and impulsive (you know, like animals) to utilize birth control even when it means not catching a disease and dirtnapping from it, perhaps they dont mind since it is common practice to rape a virgin, often a newborn baby to "cure" themselves.


then there is the standard kill the males, rape the women, torture the children procedure that is demonstrated when white folks come into the picture which you should be well familiar.



thousands of years ago white folks were building castles, arabs were building pyramids, hispanics temples, asians massive fortifications. ten minutes ago africa still cant build anything more than a glorified dog house.

here in the united states it is the same on a smaller scale, there is on segment of society that consistently underachieves every other segment, guess which one it is?


make any excuses you like, but reality is what it is.

[Lazortag]

Originally Posted by Uthgaard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not impossible for me to admit that I'm wrong. You'll find that I did just that in the beginning of the thread. Perhaps you're so mad on the internet because projecting your own flaws onto me.

His second post was racist. He may be a racist. His dislike for black people may have motivated him to criticize his sex life. But his initial post had nothing to do with the man's race. If you want to attempt to label that completely neutral statement otherwise, then at what point would one be able to criticize a person who happens to be a minority, without it being considered racist?

Perhaps you recall the thread where HBB accused me of being a homophobe for using the phrase gay club. It takes a special kind of stupid to run around accusing people of using -isms for making neutral statements of fact. Perhaps we should all just avert our eyes and pretend that minorities don't exist, for fear of offending someone by acknowledging them.

Dude, who do you think I am? I'm not some politically correct nutjob. I get that being black doesn't immunize you from criticism. You can go ahead and criticize black people, black culture, etc. all you want and I won't care. But in Darwoth's case I was merely pointing out the obvious and saying that he was only saying those things about MLK because Darwoth is a white supremacist. Notice I didn't say, "it's racist to accuse MLK of adultery". I said, "you will say anything to make the black man look bad". I made this accusation not just because of what was said about MLK, but because of who was saying it. If the average poster on this forum had said it, I wouldn't have said anything (well, I might have responded to the nonsense about MLK being a communist).

[Aesop]

Darwoth is grossly and blatantly racist, as is most of red99.

Uth, Lazor is correct in pointing out that Darwoth saying anything about Dr. King was racist. But you are correct in pointing out nothing was inherently racist about what he said.

Originally Posted by Darwoth

black africans ARE largely little more than wild animals

Originally Posted by Darwoth

even dogs do not shit all over their living quarters.

etc. etc. are pretty much the highest quality post you will get from that peon, so Lazor knowing that, can pretty much assume Darwoth is a racist piece of shit and anything he says will follow suit.

You don't have to ignore that minorities exist at all, but stating we are little more than wild animals, and slightly below dogs is slightly more offensive than recognizing we exist.

Anyhow this is all beside the point, this server is probably populated mainly by racists.