Nondisclosure of account status

[Supreme]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"A" bugged out nagafen. There have been 5 nagafen deaths in total. You guys are saying every one of them were bugged out?

Last kill was very legitimate.

[Nirgon]

NO!

We know this because we stole one of their members and then duplicated exactly what he told us man!

There are screen shots of him dead to, as I've illustrated, a ridiculously unequipped force.

Then they bring 14-15 people (same # as us) to kill him the day we contest and take it from them. How in the heck can you believe them say "we had no intention of bugging it" with 14-15 people.

Did Amelinda not AT LEAST witness 1.5-2hrs of hopeless attempts only to see him "magically" die afterwards? We have screens of Rob (naked) not being feared or breathed by the dragon. After the # of melee swings in that chat log, how can you say "oh he's not close enough" or "it was just a brief snippet".

Come on Emp..

[Rogean]

Ok so all but the last kill were legitimate?

[Supreme]

Originally Posted by Massive Marc [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

None. As stated before, EVERYONE knows (except you for some reason) that ALL the encounters were exploited.

Last kill was very legitimate.

[Massive Marc]

When was the last kill ?

[fiegi]

Last one was bullshit as well

if not why doesn't hughman post the entire raid log encounter??

It's that simple

[Slathar]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me ask you guys this question.. Do both sides of this table (I guess that would be Nihilum vs Holocaust) think that ANY of the Nagafen kills were legitimate?

If you look at the logs at each of their Nagafen kills and see who did damage and who was there you'll find:

- Several level 35-45 characters
- Less than 18 players
- Nagafen's corpse in the very spot where the exploit is known to happen (both kills 1 and 2 by Nihilum)
- 0-1 bards (and the one who was there didn't bother playing AE resists, I wonder why?)


If you add all of this up you'll see that zero of the kills were legitimate.

[Cwall]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"A" bugged out nagafen. There have been 5 nagafen deaths in total. You guys are saying every one of them were bugged out?

does it even seem possible to kill nagafen with 17 people, most of them being in their 30s, very early on in the server, with a single bard not playing resist song, and pets living through the entire fight, with all clerics having generated hardly any hate on the mob?

[Supreme]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok so all but the last kill were legitimate?

If you are asking if Nagafen was killed "as intended" then the last kill would fit that bill.

The other encounters were bugged/reported.

[Slathar]

Originally Posted by Supreme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you are asking if Nagafen was killed "as intended" then the last kill would fit that bill.

The other encounters were bugged/reported.

This is a lie.

Supreme was banned on Blue99 for use of MacroQuest2. From this pattern of behavior we can see that he is interested in exploiting game mechanics for personal gain.

Plus, he is really bad at pvp, fat and a faggot.