Nondisclosure of account status

[Peppers]

Originally Posted by Humerox [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the information was given to Holo leadership that there was a problem and that it had been reported.

They had no intention of reporting it

There's a real difference here, and anyone that argues to the contrary is a complete idiot in need of a frontal lobotomy to permanently shut their pie-hole.

1. Problem reported, nothing done, no one cares.
2. holocausts knows this.
3. Humerox applies full extent of his brain.
4. failure insues.

[Humerox]

Originally Posted by Torven [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That log suggests premeditation. Going after Nag with such a weak force to begin with is highly suspicious. Pulling Nag very far from his spawn point instead of using the nearest corner. The very little healing. The bard melee. The water pet from the get go. The not aborting the pull even when two pet casters are dead.

Everything seems to indicate that Nag never AoEed at all, not half-way through the fight as they claim.

They already admitted they knew of the problem, reported it, waited for GM response which they didn't get...and proceeded to kill Naggy anyway. I don't know that I'd have done differently in that situation.

As far as I know they didn't do it again. If they had they'd be as wrong as Holo.

[Nirgon]

Uh I was very, very vocal about it to the point that Nilbog lost his cool regarding Nagafen being exploited. I didn't know how to at the time or how to find those posted logs but I knew their numbers and from a common sense stand point knew it was not possible.

Further, obviously going after Naggy with 14 and then bragging about skill with screenies... lol. Quite a black eye and I expected MUCH different here.

[Nirgon]

Well Nagafen among other things... how mobs were being pulled using invis etc.

You want screen shots of players exploiting? They were on the front page for the longest time trolling people away from starting here.

[Humerox]

Oh I know...I'm talking about this specific incident.

My opinion on GM response is that Rogean blew a cork and went a bit overboard. Nothing me or anyone else can do cuz it's his server.

He made an example out of somebody...Holocaust was doing the wrong thing at the wrong time.

This "wrong thing" also just happened to be a major exploit...not a minor one.

[Massive Marc]

Uthgaard #1 in my books. Enough drama for all our momma's

[Nirgon]

It'd be crazy to say we didn't report it.

They showed up with around 14-15 people for Nagafen each time, suggesting they didn't intend to bug it out is also crazy.

Currently they poop sock him until he bugs out which is currently considered "legit" until stated otherwise. Then again, no response usually means they're fine doing it.

Get your guild to max level, own these fools. Then, walk a few steps in our shoes past that and see what you think about it.

It's a mistake that needs to be corrected bros. Rogean usually does the right thing in my book.

[Humerox]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Currently they poop sock him until he bugs out which is currently considered "legit" until stated otherwise. Then again, no response usually means they're fine doing it.

Afaik they're not using the bug. If they bug Naggy out to kill him, I'd expect another yellow broacast quite soon.

[Supreme]

13 year old content you do not need to know alot about how to kill nagafen.

[fiegi]

Originally Posted by Supreme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

13 year old content you do not need to know alot about how to kill nagafen.

drag to wall, slay with a bunch of mid to high lvl 30's

success