Nondisclosure of account status

[fiegi]

Originally Posted by aerokella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you quit because he broadcast that a bunch of exploiters were banned, youre probably a little exploiting bitch anyway.

Classic example of our school systems failing us

[aerokella]

No i just dont take the time to type all eloquently on....dundundun... The internets.

[Peppers]

Originally Posted by Torven [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nihilum doesn't exploit, huh? Oh, but they have 'more logs than Jesus' remember.

http://www.project1999.org/p99/?Log&Srv=5&Enc=4156163

Nihilum's first Nag 'kill'. What can we learn from this?

Reika, Fallen, Face, Milkshake, and Ganka do virtually nothing? (engaged late and/or have very low hate)

All non-damage doing healers have very low amounts of hate, suggesting very little healing done. Nerfed and Nacho appear to have done the majority of the healing, as they have several times more hate than any other healers.
Skelly, the only bard, level 45, does more damage than Hughman, suggesting no drums were used virtually the entire fight.

A few pets die very early, very fast, suggesting death from melee damage. The second round of pets survive the entire fight. Incidentally, the mage pets all have remarkably similar damages, suggesting either A) they didn't get feared at all, or B) they all got feared for virtually the same durations and no mage made any attempt to avoid fears or they somehow avoided the exact same amount of fears.

The second round of pets and most of the other attendees all join the battle nearly two minutes after the first pets die and long after initial aggro, suggesting Nagafen was pulled somewhere distant during this time.

Silver uses a water pet instead of downgrading to a fire pet. Gurrilla (and maybe Jibekn) are not yet 49, so they are stuck using the 44 fire pets because that pet is the vendor purchased pet for that tier.

Virtually all of the damage done to Nagafen comes from 8 sources: Emumu, Skelly, Silver, Jibekn, Gurrilla, Xzeal, Hughman, Nacho. Everybody else might as well not have even been there, as they did about as much damage as one 50 mage combined. (lol @ Lovely's 1.5k)

At least half the raid was between the levels 32 to 45. The above link lists current levels, but the levels of 10 people were quoted in my guild chat that night when somebody clicked the link then: Skelly 45 BARD; Lilpis 42 NEC; Bacon 40 SHM; Gurilla 46 MAG; Billy 32 WAR; Ganka 45 DRU; Xzeal 36 WAR; Calyx 34 ROG; Face 33 CLR; Milkshake 44 CLR.

The only apparent deaths are Lilpus and Jibekn who die during the 2 minute pull window, plus later Troriste, even though people as low as level 32 are present, have no bard, and are engaged for almost the entire fight after Nagafen is pulled.

Troriste was killed by his bat pet 6 seconds after it disengaged Nagafen, not by Nagafen himself. Coincidentally, Lovely joined the fight late soon after Troriste died, even though this was after he went MIA and was not seen online for some time prior and not since.

Who were the officers present?

[Torven]

One correction: Hughman also died. The apparently only death to Nag that wasn't during the pull.

[Supreme]

So what are you trying to say Torven?

[Melveny]

I like this torven he has a brain and uses it.

[Peppers]

Has anyone figured out who wins?:

Reika sucking lovely's dick
or
Nirgon sucking staff's dick


Who?

[Supreme]

Do you have the log for the last time Nagafen was killed on Red99?

[Humerox]

The primary difference is that Nihi reported the problem. They got no response at the time, so they killed a bugged Naggy. BFD. That crap happened on blue, too.

Holocaust took the info from Heartbrand and abused it. They had no intention of reporting it, and didn't care.

There's no doubt in my mind Nihi could have contended (PvP - but they didn't) the Naggy kill that Holo exploited, and I have no doubt the information was given to Holo leadership that there was a problem and that it had been reported.

There's a real difference here, and anyone that argues to the contrary is a complete idiot in need of a frontal lobotomy to permanently shut their pie-hole.

[Torven]

Originally Posted by Humerox [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The primary difference is that Nihi reported the problem.

That log suggests premeditation. Going after Nag with such a weak force to begin with is highly suspicious. Pulling Nag very far from his spawn point instead of using the nearest corner. The very little healing. The bard melee. The water pet from the get go. The not aborting the pull even when two pet casters are dead.

Everything seems to indicate that Nag never AoEed at all, not half-way through the fight as they claim.