Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: Should the same line of dots stack with each other?
Yes 44 47.31%
No 42 45.16%
Not Sure 7 7.53%
Voters: 93. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #37  
Old 11-17-2011, 07:33 PM
Dfn Dfn is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melveny [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What are you talking about??? You use nice words but the "bottom line" is all evidence provided has NOT been concrete enough to back up your statements to make 1 class have a game breaking advantage.

Are we reading the same thread or are you delusional?

Read the thread in the bug forums or do your own research. How many more sources do we need to cite for you to be convinced? Is it not enough to have direct quotes from multiple PvP Shamans from classic, citations from credible sources such as Shaman's Crucible, and dozens of references to Shaman dot stacking on various player-driven sites.

What is YOUR proof? You are relying on ONE vaguely written patch note that mentions neither Shaman nor Shaman DoTs. Druids and Necros are both specifically talked about in multiple locations whereas Shaman have never been mentioned. Why? Because it was common fucking knowledge to everyone that played a Shaman. Pick any website commonly used back in ~2000 and try to not find any posts that say Shaman dots stack. Think of it like a challenge.
Last edited by Dfn; 11-17-2011 at 07:38 PM..
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.