Resist Feedback post 11/6/2011

[juicedsixfo]

Originally Posted by Lovely [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

At the PVP event I had 10+ people on me several times and I wasn't even close to dying once.

God damn you are a giant troll. My Warrior would literally take you one vs one, and here you are talking about taking on ten versus one, SEVERAL times - AND NEVER BEING CLOSE TO DYING. We're you healing yourself as a Wizard?


Seriously, you are the worst. If one dev was ever trolled in to listening to you, shame on them. I can't wait for you to /petition an enchanter for mezzing you, or /petitioning a druid for rooting you and running out of range and healing, or basically anything that doesn't work in your fucking favor.

You are literally the worst.

[Lovely]

Originally Posted by juicedsixfo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

God damn you are a giant troll. My Warrior would literally take you one vs one, and here you are talking about taking on ten versus one, SEVERAL times - AND NEVER BEING CLOSE TO DYING. We're you healing yourself as a Wizard?


Seriously, you are the worst. If one dev was ever trolled in to listening to you, shame on them. I can't wait for you to /petition an enchanter for mezzing you, or /petitioning a druid for rooting you and running out of range and healing, or basically anything that doesn't work in your fucking favor.

You are literally the worst.

ROFL. The only troll here seems to be you. Seems you got 0 understanding of what a Wizard can do in an open outdoor PVP zone. Escaping 10 people chasing you is cake even if they got a Bard and track. Maybe not for a scrub like you but for capable players.

SINCE you challenged me im ready to log on anytime and fight your Warrior in a 1v1 LOL. If get my hp to half as a Warrior in an outdoor zone I wont make a post in this forum for a month. Im ready anytime just log on and ill be there

[Lovely]

LOL you're the guy that posted this a few days ago..

Originally Posted by juicedsixfo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Got hit for 815 by two ice comets in a row last night, with 96 MR. Hot damn! That felt good.

HAHA I rest my case. 100 bucks that you keyboard turn and that i could kill you using my staff only

[juicedsixfo]

Yes, we all you know you can spam Yonder over and over out in South Karana- welcome to being a Wizard. I'd have no problem smashing you as a Warrior, I wouldn't even need my SK or Shaman (or any class really). My War has 3.3K hp. Meet me in Lguk, Lord Room. You'd go halfway oom before I ate through your diamondskin.


Enjoy your times on beta being a solo "pvp"er.

[juicedsixfo]

By the way that quote was on my Shaman account with no gear. My warrior has 175mr, 155 cr buffed. I'll be in Lower Guk.

[juicedsixfo]

I will literally eat your face Lovely.

[Lovely]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm here waiting bro, come at me anytime. Guk is empty FYI

[DarthPeon]

Originally Posted by Nuk3Afr1ca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not all classes get resist buffs and EQ live PvP was not a forced grouping game. There's 0 reason to assume everyone has those buffs 24/7. In fact, the vast majority of people I saw PvP'ing on Sullon Zek during Velious era were soloing or duoing whether they were a melee or caster.

Your perspective is flawed for several reasons. EQ was designed as a forced grouping game and Brad Mcquaid's vocal stance on the issue was no secret.

Since everquest was designed back then as a pve game first and foremost with the pvp servers as an added bonus for variety it would be unwise to think that solo pvp would be as viable as group pvp. Just as pve encounters are designed to be best dealt with the efficient use of group mechanics, by extension pvp encounters are as well in classic everquest when you combine multiple class abilities and spells working together. Just because you solo pvped and the cesspool that was Sullon Zek attracted that mindset does not mean we should not fix the inherent flaws group pvp produces with increased resists and god-mode squads which original EQ development never gave a shit about.

So since here they are essentially designing a standalone classic-esque pvp server with longevity in mind, changes that were never considered by the original everquest devs should be made - Like keeping the resist threshold high and considering full buffs group pvp. Think of it as everquest pvp done right for 2011 knowledge and mindset.

The next issue with your line of thinking stems wholly from the fact that your attitude is shit, and people cannot stand you. You know this and you cannot stand people as well Wehrmacht. Thus you are in need of a viable solo experience. Fortunately there are still classes you can play that meet those needs in this group oriented game. Unfortunately for you, you intend on playing a ranger and don't want to get shit on under the proposed parameters.

My suggestion is to raise stun resists in line with the current root and snare resists and leave things be at the current new levels. It's best to have a higher custom threshold because original everquest never gave much consideration to pvp servers and group pvp in designing spells, items, resists and encounters. You will encounter more group pvp than your previous classic experience as evident from the many premade guilds posting here. We should continue to test changes at the highest group thresholds and make adjustments where needed.

Null, you are are doing a fantastic job.

[Nuk3Afr1ca]

Originally Posted by Dfn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

heck, a naked 50 warrior with grm will be almost immune lol.

Since you use the word "immune" as some bullshit propaganda word, like it's a negative thing, lets have a 0% resist rate for the spell blind since being immune to blind is such a bad thing right? How about rogue's instill doubt spell land every time since being immune to that is bad too right?

Then every fight can be determined by sheer luck as people randomly run into walls while being chain rooted, blinded, and stunned. Rogues can just automatically win every fight by spamming instill doubt. Sounds fucking great.

Originally Posted by Dfn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

root doesn't even last long when it lands and it can be dispelled.

Nobody gives a fuck about root in a 1vs1. We don't want to play on a forced zerging server where you have to join a group every time you log on or be root/snare spammed to death.

[Nuk3Afr1ca]

Originally Posted by Lovely [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

At the PVP event I had 10+ people on me several times and I wasn't even close to dying once and I would have been even more safe in a Classic system bullshit system.

Probably because any retard can spam shadowstep over and over to escape root/snare spam. Try playing a normal class like monk and watch as you instantly die while trying to channel pumice and have it interrupted every time with 0 channeling skill.

You claim "soloing is bad" then have no problem that some classes don't have their solo ability penalized at all, while others get huge unwarranted nerfs to solo viability.

Why should a wizard get to solo but xxxxxxx other class gets their solo ability nerfed? What's your rationalization for that? You have none.

Originally Posted by DarthPeon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your perspective is flawed for several reasons. EQ was designed as a forced grouping game and Brad Mcquaid's vocal stance on the issue was no secret.

Lol @ this bullshit.

I don't give a damn what you "claim" Brad Mcquaid said. This is an "EQ EMULATOR" server and if the actual game allowed the majority of classes to solo PvP without being chain CC spammed to death by zergers, then that's the way it should be here.

There is no rationalization for nerfing everyone's solo ability while classes like wizard and necro remain basically unaffected due to shadowstep spam.