![]() |
|
#121
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#122
|
||||
|
Quote:
I really think you're just trolling with a random text generator, cause you clearly can't understand shit people say, or follow a conversation. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#123
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#124
|
|||
|
^
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#125
|
||||
|
He would if stuns were broken
Crack head Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#126
|
|||
|
That's not the point Tamiah, stuns landing that often will let any focus target be stun locked while the assist train destroys them, just like snare/root. I'll repeat, the only warrior reference is in regards to smedy duoing with another paladin to gank a solo warrior with perma lock stuns and him trolling support of stuns.
All the SS shows is that two paladins, against the best geared warrior can be perma locked down with stun resists being broken, and that red99 will have more than two stun classes in an assist train. I really don't think you'll understand this but the fact that you can't read is more interesting to me right now then playing LoL. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#127
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#128
|
|||
|
Who's your live char Tam?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#129
|
|||
|
Stuns/roots/blinds/snares landing 150 mr+ in classic did not happen, maybe 6% of the time.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|