Hey morans - RE:Ducking

[oldfish]

Originally Posted by Booglie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just because it was in originally doesnt mean it was a good choice...
if the argument is simply "well this is the way it was," not that it is also a good idea, then i want fear and charming players back in the game, and spells landing for full damage.

Right. I remember chanters fearing people off cliffs in EC, major lulz

[Bazia]

Originally Posted by Booglie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just because it was in originally doesnt mean it was a good choice...
if the argument is simply "well this is the way it was," not that it is also a good idea, then i want fear and charming players back in the game, and spells landing for full damage.

No one gives a poop about what you want [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[PVPBetaChamps]

Originally Posted by Booglie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just because it was in originally doesnt mean it was a good choice...
if the argument is simply "well this is the way it was," not that it is also a good idea, then i want fear and charming players back in the game, and spells landing for full damage.

September 13th, 1999 9:00am
----------------------
PVP Changes:
- In order to make PVP combat between spellcasters and melee types more
viable some changes to PVP spell effects have been made. All damage spells
cast in PVP combat will do less damage to the PC than the same spell would
do to an NPC. When a PC is under the effect of a root-type spell there is a
20% chance that they will break free when a direct damage spell is cast
upon them.

November 15th, 1999 2:00pm
---------------------

*PvP and PvP-Teams*

Any spell that results in a "Fear" or "Charm" effect may no longer be cast
on other players. Please note that this change will only be active on
Rallos Zek (PvP), Tallon Zek, and Vallon Zek (PvP-Teams).

[nilbog]

Originally Posted by Booglie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just because it was in originally doesnt mean it was a good choice...
if the argument is simply "well this is the way it was," not that it is also a good idea, then i want fear and charming players back in the game, and spells landing for full damage.

So your argument is.. You want fear, charm, and spells to work classically because you think ducking shouldn't interrupt spells. As relevant as these topics aren't, I agree it should be as classic as possible.

[PVPBetaChamps]

Originally Posted by oldfish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Right. I remember chanters fearing people off cliffs in EC, major lulz

OH DO YOU BRO? DO YOU?

[Naez 4.20]

Shadows of Luclin was released on December 4, 2001.

So mid velious or so bad players can duck interrupt.

[Muaar]

release luclin immediately

[Booglie]

not all all nilblog. i just think the argument "look this is how it was when eq started" isn't a good argument when its only applied selectively.
if most people think the no ducking is for the better, fine, i can respect that. but having betapvpchamp imply that because it was in classic automatically makes it right is a crap answer.

[PVPBetaChamps]

Originally Posted by Booglie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not all all nilblog. i just think the argument "look this is how it was when eq started" isn't a good argument when its only applied selectively.
if most people think the no ducking is for the better, fine, i can respect that. but having betapvpchamp imply that because it was in classic automatically makes it right is a crap answer.

so were the other two things you listed, what else bro

[Booglie]

Originally Posted by PVPBetaChamps [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so were the other two things you listed, what else bro

i'm pretty sure one of us is failing at reading, and it could be me, but i don't quite understand what this comment means in response to what i wrote.